Search for: "United States v. Stock"
Results 1121 - 1140
of 2,648
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
23 Jun 2010, 9:20 am
United States (08-876) Argued: Dec. 8, 2009 Issue: Whether the “honest services” clause of 18 U.S.C. [read post]
19 Dec 2011, 3:12 am
The "additional matters" were: (1) United States v. [read post]
9 Jul 2015, 11:56 am
A 1992 state court of appeals opinion, Lisec v. [read post]
13 Apr 2011, 5:35 am
Attorney’s Office for the District of New Jersey April 6 charged a mergers and acquisitions attorney and a stock trader with conspiracy, securities fraud and other violations over their alleged roles in a long-running insider trading scheme that netted more than $32 million in illicit profits (United States v. [read post]
27 Aug 2007, 2:58 pm
Malandra, et. al., United States Bankruptcy Court, N.D.N.Y. [read post]
2 Feb 2014, 6:35 pm
United States v. [read post]
15 Jun 2012, 2:38 pm
Hoover was not an employee of a national stock brokerage or the employee of a member of a national stock exchange. [read post]
20 Sep 2007, 12:49 am
The stock could triple in value and pay out enormous dividends. [read post]
9 May 2018, 9:40 am
United States, 17-530, which addresses whether employee income from exercising stock options is taxable “compensation. [read post]
2 Apr 2012, 4:00 am
This principle was reaffirmed in a recent decision by the Appellate Division, Second Department, in Armentano v. [read post]
20 Mar 2012, 12:45 pm
United States, 645 F.3d 1377 (Fed. [read post]
19 Apr 2007, 1:17 am
COURT OF APPEALS, SECOND CIRCUITCriminal PracticeProbationer's Diminished Privacy Expectation, Reasonable Suspicion Justified Search Revealing Gun United States v. [read post]
8 Apr 2014, 5:25 pm
RUTAN, Appellant, v. [read post]
18 Nov 2018, 4:32 pm
United States, the U.S. [read post]
18 Jan 2016, 11:16 am
Plaintiff was represented in that transaction by one of the largest law firms in the United States. [read post]
28 Feb 2009, 8:10 pm
Thornton, et al. v. [read post]
29 Sep 2019, 2:35 pm
If, however, the Federal Government is the alleged patent infringer, the patent owner must sue the Government in the United States Court of Federal Claims and may recover only “reasonable and entire compensation” for the unauthorized use. 28 U. [read post]
13 Mar 2024, 7:30 am
In Bates et al v. [read post]
28 Sep 2010, 10:19 am
In Iowa Public Employees’ Retirement System v. [read post]
19 Jan 2007, 2:31 am
DISTRICT COURTSOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORKCriminal Practice Request for Leave to Appeal as Pauper Denied; Appeal Deemed Not Being Taken in Good Faith United States v. [read post]
