Search for: "United States v. Taylor" Results 1121 - 1140 of 1,573
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
29 May 2011, 11:38 am by Alison Rowe
Sonja Keating, Senior VP and General Counsel of the United States Equestrian Federation, and attorney Joe Terry reported on the many interesting legal issues that arose during the 2010 World Equestrian Games, held for the first time in the United States last year at the Kentucky Horse Park in Lexington. [read post]
20 Apr 2011, 3:29 am
Further, if the work to be contracted out is not “exclusive unit work,” the impact of such action of the collective bargaining unit may constitute a mandatory subject to negotiations under the Taylor Law. [read post]
8 Apr 2011, 3:59 am
Two rulings by state courts illustrate this point, Croman v City University of New York, 277 AD2d 185, and Parisi v NYC Housing Authority, Appellate Division, First Department, 269 AD2d 210. [read post]
29 Mar 2011, 12:14 pm by WISCONSIN LAW JOURNAL STAFF
United States Court of Appeals Sentencing Obstruction of justice Where a defendant’s trial testimony went beyond general denial of his involvement, his sentence was properly enhanced for obstruction of justice. [read post]
29 Mar 2011, 3:53 am
Although not identified as an issue in the Richfield Springs case, as the Appellate Division, Second Department noted in Port Washington USFD v Port Washington Teachers Association, 268 AD2d 523, [motion for leave to appeal denied, 95 NY2d 761], a statute, decisional law or public policy may preclude referring a Taylor Law contract dispute to arbitration.In Port Washington, the parties agreed to include a specific religious holiday provision in a Taylor Law agreement. [read post]
21 Mar 2011, 9:01 am by Roshonda Scipio
LGBTKF4754.5 .K59Gay and lesbian elders : history, law, and identity politics in the United States / Nancy J. [read post]
20 Mar 2011, 9:57 am by Daniel Suhr
 Constitution: “The executive Power shall be vested in a President of the United States of America. [read post]
19 Mar 2011, 1:17 pm by Steve Kalar
A slow week in the Ninth (for non-capital cases, at least), and an order amending the opinion, gives us an excuse to go back for a second pass at the interesting decision and sentencing issues in United States v. [read post]