Search for: "United States vs. Still" Results 1121 - 1140 of 1,674
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
23 Aug 2012, 11:21 am by Benjamin Wittes
Specifically, it would have been covered by 50 U.S.C. 1801(f)(2), which requires a warrant for the “acquisition by an electronic, mechanical, or other surveillance device of the contents of any wire communication to or from a person in the United States. [read post]
22 Aug 2012, 10:49 am
So, clearly, Russia's WTO accession is an economic no-brainer for the United States. [read post]
21 Aug 2012, 10:47 am by Peter Bert
If Handelsblatt is to be believed, most bank-to-bank litigation has been brought against Deutsche Bank, be it LIBOR litigation in the United States, where even venerable private bank Metzler has joined a class action against Deutsche Bank, or in Germany, with Bayerische Landesbank seeking USD 810,000,000 in relation to toxic US mortgages. [read post]
15 Aug 2012, 10:26 am by Mikko Arevuo
The Euro Zone united Germany and united the continent. [read post]
15 Aug 2012, 7:49 am by Rob Robinson
 http://bit.ly/ML5viY (Linda Sharp) Shrink it Down: Technology Assisted Review in Audio Discovery - http://bit.ly/P81RMd (Jeff Schlueter) Speed vs. [read post]
15 Aug 2012, 7:49 am by Rob Robinson
 http://bit.ly/ML5viY (Linda Sharp) Shrink it Down: Technology Assisted Review in Audio Discovery - http://bit.ly/P81RMd (Jeff Schlueter) Speed vs. [read post]
15 Aug 2012, 7:49 am by Rob Robinson
 http://bit.ly/ML5viY (Linda Sharp) Shrink it Down: Technology Assisted Review in Audio Discovery - http://bit.ly/P81RMd (Jeff Schlueter) Speed vs. [read post]
15 Aug 2012, 7:49 am by Rob Robinson
 http://bit.ly/ML5viY (Linda Sharp) Shrink it Down: Technology Assisted Review in Audio Discovery - http://bit.ly/P81RMd (Jeff Schlueter) Speed vs. [read post]
13 Aug 2012, 5:23 pm by lawmrh
No wonder they were still hungry and probably, still thirsty, too. [read post]
10 Aug 2012, 3:30 am by LindaMBeale
  Wouldn't it be prudent for the people of the United States to have the same prior to "hiring" someone to lead the country[?] [read post]
10 Aug 2012, 3:11 am by tekEditor
One is geographic/regional influence -- for instance, big tech universities being located primarily in red or blue states. [read post]
9 Aug 2012, 8:40 am by Chris Gober
” The American Tradition Partnership case involved a state’s ability to restrict corporate independent expenditures for state and local races only, buy many Americans hoped that the Court would revisit Citizens United and find that corporate independent expenditures do in fact have the ability to corrupt. [read post]
2 Aug 2012, 8:31 am by christopher
#startups nyc london…http://twitter.com/HarvardLaw74/statuses/2291836513200414722012-07-28 11:42:20 HarvardLaw74: Krista Cox 8 case citation amicus brief in Wiley First Sale case #copyright…quite good [Can a book publisher sell a book at 50 percent off overseas and prevent its import back the United States for a second sale? [read post]
2 Aug 2012, 2:31 am by tekEditor
There are many stereotypes in Germany about life in the United States. [read post]
24 Jul 2012, 10:43 pm by Mandelman
  In addition, state budget deficits in 2012-2014, and increasing city bankruptcies, both point to a need to reduce state spending from coast-to-coast in the years ahead, and that invariably means that jobs will be lost and foreclosures will rise in key states as a result. [read post]
18 Jul 2012, 3:37 pm by Gritsforbreakfast
Class Bs costs counties money while Class Cs are for the most part money makers: The public-safety juice from keeping those titular higher penalties isn't worth the taxation squeeze.Grits has suggested that similar adjustment of theft categories for inflation would allow the state to reduce the prison population enough to close multiple units. [read post]
18 Jul 2012, 2:24 pm by Gene Quinn
§ 271(a) says: "whoever without authority makes, uses, offers to sell, or sells any patented invention, within the United States, or imports into the United States any patented invention during the term of the patent therefor, infringes the patent. [read post]