Search for: "Walsh v. State"
Results 1121 - 1140
of 1,265
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
15 Jan 2009, 3:39 am
(This situation is not confined to the Federal system, either; two years ago in State v. [read post]
12 Jan 2009, 9:03 am
In United States v. [read post]
8 Jan 2009, 5:43 pm
Lopez and United States v. [read post]
19 Dec 2008, 5:00 am
" The Supreme Court's most key recent ruling on child pornography prosecutions is Ashcroft v. [read post]
17 Dec 2008, 10:33 pm
Lopez,514 U.S. at 552-553 (citing Gibbons v. [read post]
12 Dec 2008, 5:00 pm
In Mark v. [read post]
10 Dec 2008, 3:41 am
See Maxwell, 446 F.3d at 1216-17 (finding a market for child pornography and upholding congressional regulation of same); United States v. [read post]
6 Dec 2008, 1:12 am
Take it away, Felix:Wage Law, run by Michael and Mark Walsh of Walsh & Walsh, P.C, has a thoughtful post about the Brewer case we blogged about two days ago, in which the Court of Appeal recently held that punitive damages were unavailable for violations of the California laws governing meal and rest breaks, minimum wages, and pay stubs. [read post]
3 Dec 2008, 1:21 pm
Court of Appeal (Civil Division) Sprecher Grier Halberstam Llp & Anor v Walsh [2008] EWCA Civ 1324 (03 December 2008) DB, R (on the application of) v Nottinghamshire Healthcare NHS Trust [2008] EWCA Civ 1354 (03 December 2008) BK ( Democratic Republic of Congo) v Secretary of State for the Home Department [2008] EWCA Civ 1322 (03 December [...] [read post]
25 Nov 2008, 6:19 pm
In State v. [read post]
21 Nov 2008, 3:22 am
See United States v. [read post]
3 Nov 2008, 5:00 am
Supreme Court's decision in Hall Street Associates, L.L.C. v. [read post]
31 Oct 2008, 1:33 pm
While several tests were analyzed, one test of particular note (the "useful, concrete, and tangible result" test associated with methods of doing business in State Street Bank & Trust Co. v. [read post]
17 Oct 2008, 1:22 pm
State v. [read post]
8 Oct 2008, 11:55 am
The case is U.S. v. [read post]
7 Oct 2008, 11:19 am
With respect to the first counterclaim, defendants submitted evidence establishing the reasonable value of their services (see generally Phillips Nizer Benjamin Krim & Ballon v Chu, 240 AD2d 231, 659 N.Y.S.2d 4), and plaintiff failed to raise a triable issue of fact with respect to defendants' entitlement to the fees sought (see generally DiPlacidi v Walsh, 243 AD2d 335, 664 N.Y.S.2d 537; [**3] Pirro & Monsell v Freddolino, 204 AD2d 613, 614… [read post]
6 Oct 2008, 10:16 am
U.S. v. [read post]
3 Oct 2008, 4:29 am
"The stigma attached to sex offenders is significant, and the potential exists for ostracism and harassment, as the (State v. [read post]
