Search for: "Young v. State of California"
Results 1121 - 1140
of 1,502
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
28 Jun 2011, 11:34 am
The Court goes on to state that last term’s opinion in United States v. [read post]
28 Jun 2011, 6:32 am
The issue before the Supreme Court was whether the State of California could make it illegal to sell or rent violent video games to children. [read post]
27 Jun 2011, 8:40 pm
Brown v. [read post]
27 Jun 2011, 6:38 pm
The opinion is more or less mandated by United States v. [read post]
27 Jun 2011, 5:53 pm
Superior Court of California, 480 U.S. 102(1987)). [read post]
27 Jun 2011, 3:56 pm
As Justice Scalia detailed in the Court’s opinion, stories intended for young audiences – from Grimm’s Fairy Tales to The Lord of the Flies – often depict children grappling with, and even committing, violence. [read post]
27 Jun 2011, 1:15 pm
That was the ruling in U.S. v. [read post]
27 Jun 2011, 10:11 am
United States and General Dynamics v. [read post]
27 Jun 2011, 7:32 am
The case the justices decided concerned a 2005 California ban adopted by state lawmakers. [read post]
24 Jun 2011, 4:38 pm
Doudna states in his supporting affidavit that he did not write, post, or even read that report at the time. [read post]
23 Jun 2011, 12:36 pm
(Eugene Volokh) So holds Young v. [read post]
23 Jun 2011, 9:23 am
09-1039), and Actavis, Inc. v. [read post]
23 Jun 2011, 9:17 am
In the landmark Supreme Court case Griffin v. [read post]
23 Jun 2011, 9:17 am
In the landmark Supreme Court case Griffin v. [read post]
19 Jun 2011, 8:18 am
A 2005 lawsuit, Martinez v. [read post]
14 Jun 2011, 12:30 pm
http://www.courts.wa.gov/opinions/pdf/820295.opn.pdf State v. [read post]
13 Jun 2011, 8:38 pm
Smriti Malwa took her young children to the Great America theme park in Santa Clara, California. [read post]
10 Jun 2011, 5:05 pm
Interestingly, evidence was submitted by the Claimant’s American lawyer stating his belief that a Norwich Pharmacal order may be enforced in California pursuant to the recently enacted Interstate and International Depositions and Discovery Act, Cal. [read post]
7 Jun 2011, 12:25 pm
Danney, Comment, Sacking CEQA: how NFL stadium developers may have tackled the California Environmental Quality Act, 19 PENN STATE ENVIRONMENTAL LAW REVIEW 131 (2011)Carolyn Davis, Note, Leave it on the field: too expansive approach to evaluating Title IX compliance in Biediger v. [read post]
6 Jun 2011, 12:24 pm
Supreme Court decision (Brown v. [read post]
