Search for: "***u. S. v. Wells" Results 1141 - 1160 of 4,285
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
14 Mar 2020, 5:18 am
This morning one woke up, hours aftre President Trump declared a national emergency, to news that the House of Representatives (with the encouragement of both President Trump and Speaker Pelosi) passed HR 6201, the “Families First Coronavirus Response Act. [read post]
10 Mar 2020, 8:43 pm by Chris Castle
  It is thus striking that the Subcommittee is to hear from Julia Reda, the long-time representative of the Pirate Party in the European Parliament, as well as so many other beneficiaries of Google’s support. [read post]
10 Mar 2020, 4:36 am by INFORRM
The Oberster Gerichtshof (the Supreme Court of Austria) has confirmed that claims for damages pursuant to Article 82 may be maintained in class actions in the Austrian courts (see Schrems v Facebook Ireland 6Ob91/19d (23 May 2019)), but the decision of the Innsbruck court puts paid to any class action arising out of this breach, as well as to a claim in which a plaintiff seeks €1,000 compensation for each of 12 cookies placed on her computer by… [read post]
5 Mar 2020, 4:04 am by Andrew Lavoott Bluestone
In Zegelstein v The Roth Law Firm PLLC  2020 NY Slip Op 30581(U) February 28, 2020 Supreme Court, New York County Docket Number: 154224/2018 Judge: W. [read post]
25 Feb 2020, 12:26 pm by Eugene Volokh
The Supreme Court's decision in Capital U-Drive-It, together with well developed caselaw in the Fourth Circuit and Rule 41.1 of the South Carolina Rules of Civil Procedure, lay down both substantive and procedural standards for assessing motions to seal court records. [read post]
25 Feb 2020, 11:29 am by Patricia Hughes
As Jennifer Klinck and Madelaine Mackenzie write in The Globe and Mail, …[U]nequal distribution of wealth and social standing amplifies some voices and silences others. [read post]
24 Feb 2020, 10:03 am by Nathaniel Sobel
It is well recognized that the Constitution forbids general warrants. [read post]
14 Feb 2020, 4:00 am by Daniel E. Cummins, Esq.
By Gantman, P.J.E.), involved both the Sackett stacking issue as well as the issue of the retroactive effect of the Pennsylvania’s eradication of the household exclusion in the Gallagher v. [read post]
12 Feb 2020, 5:34 pm by David Kopel
The district court agreed with General Becerra's argument that the banned rifles are not well-suited for self-defense. [read post]
12 Feb 2020, 3:00 am by John Jenkins
Well, we thought that the comment process for the SEC’s proposed proxy advisor regulations was going to be a free-for-all, and it hasn’t disappointed. [read post]
6 Feb 2020, 8:33 am by Florian Mueller
But today was the first situation in which two parties (a plaintiff and an intervenor) traded accusations involving FOSS Patents in different ways.Various suppliers are intervening on Daimler's behalf in today's Nokia v. [read post]