Search for: "AC v. State"
Results 1141 - 1160
of 1,886
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
26 Nov 2013, 3:30 pm
”And finally, did:the combined effect of [R (Limbuela) -v- Secretary of State for the Home Department [2006] 1 AC 396 (HL(E)) ] and Clue establish that there is a free standing duty to accommodate and provide cash to a person like the Claimant who is within the boundaries of a local authority and whose Convention rights are threatened? [read post]
26 Nov 2013, 3:30 pm
”And finally, did:the combined effect of [R (Limbuela) -v- Secretary of State for the Home Department [2006] 1 AC 396 (HL(E)) ] and Clue establish that there is a free standing duty to accommodate and provide cash to a person like the Claimant who is within the boundaries of a local authority and whose Convention rights are threatened? [read post]
2 Dec 2019, 2:30 am
Halliburton Company v Chubb Bermuda Insurance Ltd (Formerly known as Ace Bermuda Insurance Ltd, heard 12-13 November 2019. [read post]
26 Oct 2010, 5:21 pm
But as was stated in Re S, there is no presumptive priority between ECHR rights. [read post]
12 Nov 2018, 1:00 am
R (Hallam) v Secretary of State for Justice; R (Nealon) v Secretary of State for Justice, heard 8-9 May 2018. [read post]
1 Jun 2020, 7:44 am
R (on the application of Pathan) v Secretary of State for the Home Department, heard 12 December 2019. [read post]
9 Nov 2020, 1:00 am
The following Supreme Court judgments remain outstanding: Keefe (by his litigation friend Eyton) v Hoteles Pinero Canarias SL, heard 7 Mar 2017 Arcadia Petroleum Ltd & Ors v Bosworth & Anor, heard 10-11 Apr 2017 Mastercard Incorporated & Ors v Walter Hugh Merricks CBE, heard 13 and 14 May 2019 Test Claimants in the Franked Investment Income Group Litigation & Ors v Commissioners of Inland Revenue, heard 27 June 2019 In the matter of an application… [read post]
22 Jul 2014, 7:19 am
In R v Lord Chancellor Ex p Witham[1998] QB 575 he noted (at 581) that “in the unwritten legal order of the British state” it is “the common law [which] continues to accord a legislative supremacy to Parliament”. [read post]
20 Jun 2007, 5:14 am
In Cream v Banerjee Lord Nicholls addressed this provision and said it demanded flexibility in its application. [read post]
7 Feb 2017, 3:34 am
” (quoting Hilton v. [read post]
17 Feb 2020, 2:13 am
Halliburton Company v Chubb Bermuda Insurance Ltd (Formerly known as Ace Bermuda Insurance Ltd), heard 12-13 November 2019. [read post]
28 Mar 2015, 5:41 pm
As Lord Browne-Wilkinson said in R v Secretary of State for the Home Department, Ex p Pierson [1998] AC 539: A power conferred by Parliament in general terms is not to be taken to authorise the doing of acts by the donee of the power which adversely affect the legal rights of the citizen or the basic principles on which the law of the United Kingdom is based unless the statute conferring the power makes it clear that such was the intention of Parliament. [read post]
14 Apr 2023, 8:30 am
June 19, 2003), 7 ACE American Ins. [read post]
5 Aug 2015, 7:58 am
The Supreme Court recently clarified in Crawford v. [read post]
2 Mar 2009, 3:17 pm
As this was not a mortgage or security charge, the contractual and equitable right to redeem, Kreglinger v New Patagonia Meat and Cold Storage Company Limited [1914] AC 25, did not arise; Welsh Development Agency v Export Finance Co Limited [1992] BCC 270, Lavin v Johnson [2002] EWCA Civ 1138 and Dutton v Davis [2006] EWCA Civ 694 followed. [read post]
25 Jul 2020, 12:21 am
Think of Walz v. [read post]
13 Nov 2011, 3:51 pm
Bubb v London Borough of Wandsworth [2011] EWCA Civ 1285In an appeal under s.204 Housing Act 1996, should the County Court determine disputed factual issues? [read post]
13 Nov 2011, 3:51 pm
Bubb v London Borough of Wandsworth [2011] EWCA Civ 1285In an appeal under s.204 Housing Act 1996, should the County Court determine disputed factual issues? [read post]
19 Nov 2020, 6:47 am
” (Campagnolla v Mulholland, 76 NY2d 38, 42 [1990].) [read post]
7 Nov 2016, 4:14 am
” At ACS, Sandra Park looks at Lynch v. [read post]
