Search for: "Ace v. State"
Results 1141 - 1160
of 1,884
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
21 Mar 2012, 12:07 am
Whilst the courts were slow to interfere in the executive’s assessment of whether there was a public emergency threatening the life of the nation in the Belmarsh case (A v Secretary of State for the Home Department [2005] 2 AC 68), and accorded the Secretary of State’s assessment “great weight”, it did actually perform a review of that assessment, albeit granting the executive a wide discretionary area of judgement. [read post]
16 Mar 2012, 6:00 am
The recent Tesla v BBC case ([2012] EWHC 310 (QB)) is a notable exception. [read post]
14 Mar 2012, 2:29 pm
Ace Ventura, Pet Detective. [read post]
14 Mar 2012, 7:57 am
bit.ly/zpfcer (Elkan Abramowitz, Barry Bohrer) Reports and Resources Classified National Security Information Program for State, Local, Tribal and Private Sector (PDF) 1.usa.gov/yzxOby (Homeland Security) comScore Releases February 2012 U.S. [read post]
8 Mar 2012, 10:59 pm
The importance of the role of the media to the principle of open justice is nothing new: see, eg Scott v Scott [1913] AC 417. [read post]
8 Mar 2012, 11:40 am
From page five (citations omitted): This is all a dreadful muddle, for which we appellate judges must accept some blame because doctrine stated as metaphor, such as the “cat’s paw” theory of liability, which we introduced into employment discrimination law in Shager v. [read post]
6 Mar 2012, 9:19 am
Cisco Systems, Inc., 01-cv-71113-AC (D. [read post]
5 Mar 2012, 8:42 am
As to what is “fair dealing”, the law was clearly stated by the Supreme Court of Canada in CCH v. [read post]
5 Mar 2012, 2:05 am
Extradition in the public interest would, however, generally be proportionate under Article 8(2) (Norris v Government of the United States of America (No.2) [2010] 2 AC 487). [read post]
4 Mar 2012, 9:15 am
of depth of swimming pool in Ruxley Electronics and Construction Ltd v Forsyth [1996] AC 344, where an award of damages in lieu was made. [read post]
4 Mar 2012, 9:15 am
of depth of swimming pool in Ruxley Electronics and Construction Ltd v Forsyth [1996] AC 344, where an award of damages in lieu was made. [read post]
1 Mar 2012, 9:47 am
A.C. v. [read post]
29 Feb 2012, 4:09 pm
(In Planned Parenthood v. [read post]
29 Feb 2012, 2:29 pm
Quoting Lord Irvine LC in DPP v Jones [1999] 2 AC 240, Lindbolm J noted that unless the law is that assembly on the public highway may be lawful the right contained in article 11(1) is denied. [read post]
29 Feb 2012, 5:54 am
bit.ly/zwruTK (Ron Friedmann) Cost of Converting (Electronically Stored Information) Jardin v. [read post]
27 Feb 2012, 7:13 am
It noted that in AC v. [read post]
24 Feb 2012, 8:01 am
In Coca-Cola Enterprises Inc. and ACE American Insurance Co. v. [read post]
22 Feb 2012, 6:22 pm
Given the CCH v. [read post]
22 Feb 2012, 4:40 am
bit.ly/yRWkxa (Henry Kelston) How to Create an eDiscovery Team – An Interview with HB Gordan from Teva Pharmaceuticals – bit.ly/xCM6yj (Amber Scorah) How to Reduce Medical Malpractice eDiscovery Issues and Costs - bit.ly/ylZmA5 (Matthew Keris) Innovation and Informed Risk-Taking are an eDiscovery Duty - bit.ly/zKtiDm (Chris Dale) Lester v. [read post]
21 Feb 2012, 10:58 pm
Thus, for example, in Jameel v Wall Street Journal Europe SPRL ([2007] 1 AC 359) Baroness Hale argued that the public have a right to know only if there is “a real public interest in communicating and receiving the information. [read post]
