Search for: "American Federation of Government Employees v. United States"
Results 1141 - 1160
of 1,886
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
12 Feb 2015, 6:19 am
American Federation of State, County and Municipal Employees, Council 31, one of the unions named in Rauner’s lawsuit, wasted no time responding to the development with this statement: Child protection workers, caregivers for veterans and the disabled, correctional officers, and everyone else employed by state government has a right to a voice at work and in the democratic process through their union. [read post]
4 Feb 2015, 4:25 am
Porteadores then challenged the commission's ability to take jurisdiction over it, since it was a foreign company and its corporate activities in the United States were governed by the North American Free Trade Agreement, not Arizona law. [read post]
1 Feb 2015, 3:59 pm
Employee salary increases? [read post]
29 Jan 2015, 7:27 am
Burwell, in which the Court will consider whether tax subsidies are available for individuals who purchase their health insurance on an exchange established by the federal government. [read post]
28 Jan 2015, 6:13 am
Consequently, Gunter contests only the search of his data files conducted in the United States by U.S. officials.U.S. v. [read post]
22 Jan 2015, 10:15 am
For example, the Service Contract Act (“SCA”), 41 U.S.C. chapter 67, is applicable to certain Federal contracts and subcontracts that utilize service employees to furnish services in the United States. [read post]
8 Jan 2015, 8:32 am
United States. [read post]
7 Jan 2015, 10:52 am
Employee Leadership Fund v. [read post]
6 Jan 2015, 9:01 pm
United States), for federal agents, and to 1961 (Mapp v. [read post]
6 Jan 2015, 8:10 am
The Court also found, as an alternative basis for dismissing the complaint, that Glendale’s statue conveyed a message that was actually consistent with United States foreign policy. [read post]
6 Jan 2015, 6:54 am
Ct. 1426 (2013), American Express Co. v. [read post]
6 Jan 2015, 4:14 am
As discussed here, in Public Employees’ Retirement System of Mississippi, v. [read post]
5 Jan 2015, 9:01 pm
Title IX provides that “no person in the United States shall, on the basis of sex, be excluded from participation in, be denied the benefits of, or be subjected to discrimination under any educational program or activity receiving Federal financial assistance. [read post]
31 Dec 2014, 7:09 am
That they can bring this claim at all – suing a foreign government, in federal court, seeking a damage award against it for conduct undertaken by that foreign government wholly outside the borders of the United States – is itself a noteworthy feature of the new legal landscape. [read post]
27 Dec 2014, 2:19 am
More from Europe: In Case C-355/12 Nintendo v PC Box the CJEU said that circumventing a protection system may not be unlawful. [read post]
26 Dec 2014, 8:43 am
” The lawsuit is captioned United States and State of California ex rel. [read post]
21 Dec 2014, 4:17 am
United States In Ratzlaf v. [read post]
4 Dec 2014, 11:05 am
United States, 13-10639, asking whether the Eleventh Circuit’s appellate procedural default rule – prohibiting consideration of issues not raised in an appellant’s opening brief – conflicts with retroactivity rules when new precedent changes the law after briefing. [read post]
2 Dec 2014, 8:22 am
United Parcel Service, Inc. [read post]
23 Nov 2014, 2:32 pm
The main impact of this Act has been to grant US Federal Courts the ability to hear cases dealing with private claims for a reasonable number of international law violations, provided they are in breach of the Law of Nations or a treaty of the United States. [read post]
