Search for: "Arnold v. Arnold"
Results 1141 - 1160
of 2,125
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
24 Dec 2014, 3:39 am
Rob Law, owner of luggage company Magmatic, which produces kids’ travel accessories brand Trunki, believes he has secured a victory for British design businesses by winning the right to fight the ruling made by the UK Court of Appeal that PMS International's discounted - and allegedly copycat - Kiddee Cases - did not infringe Truki's designs - overturning Mr Justice Arnold (Magmatic Ltd v PMS International Ltd [2014] EWCA Civ 181). [read post]
25 Oct 2016, 10:45 pm
| Book review: Computer Crimes and Digital Investigations | European business urge continued UK involvement in UPC on eve of Competitiveness Council meeting | Wednesday Whimsies | Book review: Global Governance of Intellectual Property in the 21st CenturyNever too late 115 [week ending on Sunday 25 September] | Book Review: Arnold reviews “Economic Approaches to Intellectual Property” | The English approach to obviousness – It all depends on the facts? [read post]
4 Dec 2022, 6:32 pm
The case, 303 Creative v. [read post]
18 Apr 2013, 4:44 pm
In GlaxoSmithKline v Comptroller General of Patents [2013] EWHC 619 (Pat) the following questions were referred: 1. [read post]
13 Dec 2023, 5:08 am
(That action, Peter Arnold et al. v 4-6 Bleecker Street LLC et al., has the NYSCEF Index no. 158541/2013.) [read post]
25 Aug 2021, 3:02 am
” “In order to succeed on a claim for accounting malpractice, a plaintiff must demonstrate a departure from accepted standards of practice and that the departure was a proximate cause of injury (see KBL, LLP v Community Counseling & Mediation Servs., 123 AD3d 488 [2014]; Kristina Denise Enters., Inc. v Arnold, 41 AD3d 788 [2007]; D.D. [read post]
2 Oct 2011, 9:03 am
Mr Justice Arnold (Patents Court, England and Wales), Professor Jo Gibson (Intellectual Property Institute and Queen Mary Intellectual Property Research Institute) and Chris Stothers (IBIL and Arnold & Porter) will be there and the Kat hopes to confirm the presence of one of the stars from the Intellectual Property Institute's Economics Unit. [read post]
24 Jan 2009, 12:58 am
The IPKat wonders whether, if this was brought up at the time the Dyson v Hoover case was being heard back in 2000 and 2001, this might have affected the outcome. [read post]
8 Dec 2010, 1:49 am
Talking of Mr Justice Arnold, that very same judge drew the Kats' attention to a recent Patents Court for England and Wales decision of Mr Justice Floyd in Daiichi Sankyo v Comptroller of Patents in which Novartis was not allowed to join this case as a party in order to participate in its reference to the Court of Justice for a preliminary ruling. [read post]
7 Jun 2010, 3:57 pm
In response, the engineers not only defended the appeal but issued proceedings for breach of contract and sought summary judgment.Mr Justice Arnold, giving summary judgment in favour of the engineers, dismissed the watchmaker's appeal. [read post]
17 Feb 2011, 1:36 pm
Perry v. [read post]
28 Sep 2012, 11:33 am
In NJDEP v. [read post]
7 May 2019, 2:26 pm
Today, the Court presiding over the Carnival pollution case styled U.S. v. [read post]
23 Aug 2015, 9:01 pm
Arnold B. [read post]
12 Jan 2010, 3:19 pm
In today’s case (Gregory v. [read post]
19 Feb 2009, 1:01 am
Wandel et al. v. [read post]
24 Oct 2016, 10:09 am
Facts: This case (Hersko v. [read post]
22 Jan 2009, 11:22 pm
In Community Youth Athletic Center v. [read post]
10 Jun 2008, 10:16 am
Arnold delivered the decision. [read post]
26 Feb 2008, 11:07 am
On February 20, 2008, in an 8-1 decision, the United States Supreme Court decided the case of Preston v. [read post]
