Search for: "BEENE v. BEENE" Results 1141 - 1160 of 191,930
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
29 Jul 2024, 4:05 pm by Lawrence Solum
Section V muddles our picture with two stories of the Supreme Court serving as a roadblock to addressing persistent women’s rights concerns. [read post]
29 Jul 2024, 11:58 am by Ilya Somin
The Supreme Court's badly flawed recent ruling in Trump v. [read post]
29 Jul 2024, 11:50 am by Katitza Rodriguez
It lets governments spy on people to gather potential evidence for any crime if they’ve been committed using ICT. [read post]
29 Jul 2024, 11:41 am by Daniel M. Kowalski
Nonimmigrants in valid V-1 or V-2/V-3 status or K-3/K-4 status who have an I-485 application pending also do not need advance parole. [read post]
29 Jul 2024, 10:21 am by Will Baude
Two take two of his examples: Chief Justice Roberts's infamous vote and opinion in NFIB v. [read post]
29 Jul 2024, 9:56 am by Josh Blackman
" On top of dangerous and extreme decisions that overturn settled legal precedents — including Roe v. [read post]
29 Jul 2024, 8:24 am by Jonathan H. Adler
CNN's Joan Biskupic has an inside report on what happened at the Supreme Court behind-the-scenes in Moyle v. [read post]
29 Jul 2024, 7:24 am by Eleonora Rosati
How does acquiescence work now that the importance of this doctrine has been elevated following the Heitec and Combe decisions? [read post]
29 Jul 2024, 6:00 am by Public Employment Law Press
 Citing Matter of Castillo v Town of Oyster Bay, 70 AD3d 939, the Appellate Division affirmed the Supreme Court's order and judgment "insofar as appealed from", explaining that "[because] the contentions raised by the [Petitioner] on appeal concerning the exhaustion of administrative remedies do not present pure questions of law appearing on the face of the record that could not have been avoided if raised at the proper juncture, they are improperly… [read post]
29 Jul 2024, 6:00 am by Public Employment Law Press
 Citing Matter of Castillo v Town of Oyster Bay, 70 AD3d 939, the Appellate Division affirmed the Supreme Court's order and judgment "insofar as appealed from", explaining that "[because] the contentions raised by the [Petitioner] on appeal concerning the exhaustion of administrative remedies do not present pure questions of law appearing on the face of the record that could not have been avoided if raised at the proper juncture, they are improperly… [read post]
29 Jul 2024, 5:00 am by Written on behalf of Peter McSherry
Employee Becomes Mother’s Primary Caregiver The facts that gave rise to the complaint of discrimination in Cosentino v Octapharma Canada Inc. arose in early 2020, during the onset of the COVID-19 pandemic. [read post]