Search for: "Bank Line v. United States" Results 1141 - 1160 of 1,533
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
27 Oct 2011, 11:34 am by James Hamilton
The Supreme Court effectively replaced the conduct and effects test with a transactional test and imposed a bright line rule on the cross-border availability of Rule 10b-5.In Morrison v. [read post]
15 Oct 2011, 4:43 am by Mandelman
  So, plotting data on a ‘V” shaped model but having it turn out to be a different letter of  the alphabet, is a like drawing the route New Jersey on a map of Australia. [read post]
14 Oct 2011, 8:33 am by Kiera Flynn
_________________________________________________  United States v. [read post]
4 Oct 2011, 9:46 am
The Federal Court Judge explained the history of debt collection laws in the United States, stating: "Following World War II there was an explosion of consumer credit in the United States. [read post]
27 Sep 2011, 1:10 pm by Phil Cave
in United States v. [read post]
24 Sep 2011, 6:13 am by Christa Culver
Certiorari stage documents:Opinion below (9th Circuit) Petition for certiorari Brief in opposition Petitioner's reply United States Steel Corp. v. [read post]
19 Sep 2011, 9:40 am by totmauthor
Virginia State Bar (the First Amendment protects the rights of union members to “maintain and carry out their plan for advising workers who are injured to obtain legal advice”); United Mine Workers of America, Dist. 12 v. [read post]
14 Sep 2011, 8:07 am by Matt C. Bailey
Finally, Judge Kriegler, concurring in the Brown decision, notes that, although Concepcion may have called Gentry's survival into doubt, "Gentry remains the binding law of this state which we must follow," until the California or United States Supreme Court rules otherwise. 197 Cal. [read post]
18 Aug 2011, 11:10 pm by Christa Culver
Saudi Arabian Oil Co.Docket: 10-1393Issue(s): (1) Whether the political question doctrine deprives the federal courts of jurisdiction to adjudicate a Sherman Act and Clayton Act damage case against both private and state-owned businesses operating in the United States; and (2) whether the act of state doctrine bars antitrust claims against defendants whose conduct was commercial, and where it came to fruition and had its effect in the United… [read post]