Search for: "Bare v. Bare"
Results 1141 - 1160
of 5,017
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
15 Jul 2019, 5:01 am
Nixon v. [read post]
14 Jul 2019, 6:01 pm
., Trump v. [read post]
11 Jul 2019, 10:20 am
This was best illustrated by Professor Mario Franzosi many years ago with his famous “Angora cat” metaphor, which was embellished by Lord Justice Jacob in European Central Bank v DSS [2008] EWCA Civ 192 to read as follows: “Professor Mario Franzosi likens a patentee to an Angora cat. [read post]
10 Jul 2019, 8:18 am
In Trammell v. [read post]
9 Jul 2019, 8:55 am
Mitchell v. [read post]
9 Jul 2019, 5:02 am
Also happening at the same time: a new HBO documentary, "I Love You, Now Die: The Commonwealth v. [read post]
9 Jul 2019, 4:42 am
As noted, the court found that this plaintiff could have raised the same types of issues and arguments as asserted in the Gallagher v. [read post]
7 Jul 2019, 3:00 am
Ludovico Sculpture Trail Corp. v Town of Seneca Falls, 2019 NY Slip Op 04621 (4th Dept. 6/7/19) [read post]
2 Jul 2019, 9:08 am
New York and Rucho v. [read post]
1 Jul 2019, 9:14 am
Max, Obado v. [read post]
1 Jul 2019, 4:09 am
Madison Sullivan Partners LLC v PMG Sullivan St., LLC Madison Sullivan Partners LLC v PMG Sullivan St., LLC, 2019 NY Slip Op 04460 [1st Dept June 6, 2019], involved a dispute between 50/50 owners of a real estate venture organized as a Delaware LLC. [read post]
1 Jul 2019, 12:09 am
They argued that Hadid posted the photograph in a “barely cropped” form for the purpose of depicting exactly that of the original. [read post]
30 Jun 2019, 6:30 am
Larry Lessig is clearly one of the most interesting and imaginative scholars within the legal academy, and he has written a book that fully vindicates the enthusiastic blurbs it receives (from myself, as well as others). [read post]
29 Jun 2019, 8:52 am
Simcox v. [read post]
28 Jun 2019, 11:01 am
Common Cause and Lamone v. [read post]
28 Jun 2019, 8:51 am
But the Supreme Court’s decision in Department of Commerce v. [read post]
27 Jun 2019, 4:09 am
SmithKline Beecham and Gonzales v. [read post]
26 Jun 2019, 9:01 pm
Section One straightforwardly provides: The right of citizens of the United States to vote shall not be denied or abridged by the United States or by any State on account of sex.Moving beyond the bare text, it is important, even (maybe especially) a hundred years later, to think more about what the Amendment really sought to constitutionally accomplish, and how its full import has not been deeply understood. [read post]
25 Jun 2019, 6:08 am
Some background first: In Matal v. [read post]
24 Jun 2019, 3:28 am
Take Hanley v Hanley, 2019 NY Slip Op 50970(U) [Sup Ct Albany County June 13, 2019], in which Justice Richard M. [read post]
