Search for: "Bays v. State"
Results 1141 - 1160
of 3,060
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
7 Mar 2016, 1:55 am
Emma recounts the state of confusion of copyright in Trinidad’s Carnival industry also via a lovely song of this year’s popular Carnival tunes, which she amended for the Kat-readership's pleasure. [read post]
20 Dec 2013, 8:53 am
Bay Area Air Quality Management Dist., S213478. [read post]
3 Mar 2010, 6:20 pm
According to the North Bay Business Journal, two of the cases sold in Wisconsin went to relatives of Trek Wine owners. [read post]
3 Mar 2010, 6:20 pm
” According to the North Bay Business Journal, two of the cases sold in Wisconsin went to relatives of Trek Wine owners. [read post]
7 Jan 2019, 4:53 am
Qualcomm antitrust trial will begin in the United States District Court for the Northern District of California. [read post]
3 Jan 2008, 10:17 pm
City of Half Moon Bay, No. 05-4149 VRW (Nov. 28, 2007). [read post]
29 Oct 2012, 10:12 pm
But there are critical differences between Landsberg Prison, circa 1950, and the United States Naval Station at Guantanamo Bay in 2008. [read post]
8 Oct 2011, 9:49 am
This statute has been held invalid (see Lett v. [read post]
30 Jul 2018, 9:30 pm
For example, in United States v. [read post]
24 Nov 2008, 7:54 pm
Circuit Judge Karen LeCraft Henderson on Monday held the fate of 17 Chinese Muslim detainees at Guatanamo Bay in her hands. [read post]
25 Oct 2011, 4:24 pm
The Law Offices of James V. [read post]
29 Oct 2013, 7:11 am
Adelson v. [read post]
18 Jun 2024, 6:00 am
"When presented with a question of statutory interpretation, a court's primary consideration is to ascertain and give effect to the intention of the Legislature" (Matter of Walsh v New York State Comptroller, 34 NY3d 520, 524 [2019] [internal quotation marks and citations omitted]; see Matter of Digbasanis v Pelham Bay Donuts Inc., 224 AD3d 1047, 1048 [3d Dept 2024]). [read post]
18 Jun 2024, 6:00 am
"When presented with a question of statutory interpretation, a court's primary consideration is to ascertain and give effect to the intention of the Legislature" (Matter of Walsh v New York State Comptroller, 34 NY3d 520, 524 [2019] [internal quotation marks and citations omitted]; see Matter of Digbasanis v Pelham Bay Donuts Inc., 224 AD3d 1047, 1048 [3d Dept 2024]). [read post]
25 Mar 2024, 5:12 am
Co., 190 AD3d 985, 989; 25 Bay Terrace Assoc., L.P. v Public Serv. [read post]
17 Aug 2022, 1:32 pm
Plain Bay Sales, LLC v. [read post]
21 Jul 2008, 8:54 pm
United States that the detainees at Guantánamo Bay have a constitutional right to habeas corpus, to challenge their detention before a neutral judge in a real court. [read post]
18 Jun 2008, 1:18 am
Sierra Club v. [read post]
6 Feb 2021, 4:45 pm
Supreme Court in South Bay United Pentecostal Church v. [read post]
11 Jun 2007, 10:06 am
He was not captured outside the United States, he is not being held at Guantanamo Bay or elsewhere outside the United States, he has not been afforded a CSRT, he has not been 'determined by the United States to have been properly detained as an enemy combatant,' and he is not 'awaiting such determination.' The MCA was not intended to, and does not, apply to aliens like al-Marri, who have legally entered, and are seized while legally residing… [read post]
