Search for: "Born v. State"
Results 1141 - 1160
of 4,832
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
29 Sep 2010, 5:07 am
See Hurley v. [read post]
15 Jan 2015, 9:57 am
Constitution; and (2) whether Ohio’s refusal to recognize a judgment of adoption of an Ohio-born child issued to a same-sex couple by the courts of a sister state violates the Full Faith and Credit Clause of the U.S. [read post]
14 Jan 2010, 7:25 pm
Mary’s, Inc. v. [read post]
17 May 2011, 4:09 am
Two provisions of the Constitution relate to it most directly: the requirement in Article II that the President must be a “natural born citizen” (coupled with varying requirements for length of citizenship for service in the House and Senate), and the Citizenship Clause of the Fourteenth Amendment, which recognizes birthright citizenship for “all persons born or naturalized in the United States, and subject to the jurisdiction thereof. [read post]
26 Oct 2013, 2:48 pm
The topic is Tinker v. [read post]
30 Nov 2017, 10:20 am
Yishai Schwartz provided an update on military commission proceedings in United States v. al-Nashiri. [read post]
23 Apr 2020, 9:32 am
Washington and Colorado Department of State v. [read post]
17 Feb 2024, 8:42 am
State v. [read post]
13 May 2014, 10:17 am
Abbott Foothill Communities Coalition v. [read post]
22 Aug 2024, 4:39 am
The child was born in Michigan, and state law prevented Partner from being listed on the birth certificate. [read post]
27 Feb 2007, 12:42 pm
The court noted the Restatement of Torts:...which states that "[o]ne who tortiously causes harm to an unborn child is subject to liability to the child for the harm if the child is born alive. [read post]
3 Oct 2009, 3:50 pm
Hence, the Fourteenth Amendment was born in 1868. [read post]
23 May 2011, 9:34 am
United States, No. 09-5801, an equal protection challenge to the federal government’s disparate treatment of male and female U.S. citizens for purposes of establishing the citizenship of their children born overseas. [read post]
21 Jul 2010, 12:31 pm
Court of Appeals v. [read post]
3 Jun 2011, 3:38 am
At paragraph 134, it stated that: “It will be for the Respondent state to implement . . . appropriate general and/or individual measures to fulfil its obligations to secure the rights of the applications and other persons in their position to respect for their private life. [read post]
27 Jan 2019, 5:47 pm
In JG v. [read post]
25 Jan 2016, 7:31 am
Finally, the case also reminds us that even successful public law challenges to state decisions can be financially pyrrhic. [read post]
21 Nov 2024, 2:13 pm
That is what happened in the K.K. v. [read post]
25 Oct 2022, 10:46 am
Brief of the United States as Amicus Curiae, New York v. [read post]
13 Jun 2022, 1:01 am
Thurgood Marshall was born on July 2, 1908 in Baltimore, Maryland. [read post]