Search for: "Burwell v. Burwell"
Results 1141 - 1160
of 1,518
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
9 Jan 2015, 1:05 pm
There is an illuminating piece by Stephen Stromberg in today's Washington Post on the utter disaster that will ensue if those supporting the challenge in Burwell prevail before the Supreme Court re the "state" as distinguished from "federal" exhanges. [read post]
8 Jan 2015, 3:57 am
Today’s coverage of and commentary on the Court focus on King v. [read post]
7 Jan 2015, 2:36 pm
" [The Oklahoman] * Keeping politics out of King v. [read post]
7 Jan 2015, 4:00 am
Supreme Court after its Hobby Lobby decision (see prior posting), in Autocam Corp. v. [read post]
2 Jan 2015, 10:30 am
Willis as Amici Curiae in Support of Petitioners, King v. [read post]
1 Jan 2015, 8:30 am
Burwell, 759 F.3d 358 (4th Cir. 2014)) Loving And Ridgely Take On The IRS (Loving v. [read post]
31 Dec 2014, 4:41 am
News) reports that Bobby Chen, the pro se petitioner in Chen v. [read post]
30 Dec 2014, 6:46 am
Burwell, is the only case set for oral argument on Wednesday, March 4. [read post]
30 Dec 2014, 6:13 am
Burwell with Professor Nicholas Bagley of the University of Michigan. [read post]
30 Dec 2014, 4:05 am
In Catholic Benefits Association LCA v. [read post]
30 Dec 2014, 4:04 am
In an interview for NPR, Nina Totenberg previews King v. [read post]
29 Dec 2014, 2:58 pm
Oklahoma has filed its own petition, asking the Court to grant review of the separate case of Oklahoma v Burwell and schedule it along with the King case for decision before the U.S. [read post]
29 Dec 2014, 7:46 am
The Supreme Court will hear King v. [read post]
23 Dec 2014, 5:30 pm
The 2014 GMO Legislation Scorecard – Mina Nasseri and Dan Herling of Mintz Levin on the firm’s blog, Consumer Product Matters Frackers v. [read post]
23 Dec 2014, 5:31 am
Burwell is the only case scheduled for March 4, apparently to give the Court the option of hearing more than the usual one hour of argument. [read post]
21 Dec 2014, 11:22 am
Burwell. [read post]
19 Dec 2014, 3:32 am
Burwell will be a very easy case indeed – if the Supreme Court reads the law to mean what it says. [read post]
18 Dec 2014, 9:38 am
” As Sullivan notes, the Religious Freedom Restoration Act (RFRA)—the basis of the Burwell v. [read post]
17 Dec 2014, 9:13 am
Election Comm’n, 558 U.S. 310 (2010) (concluding that a “prohibition on independent corporate expenditure is a ban on speech”) and Burwell et. al v. [read post]
17 Dec 2014, 4:00 am
Burwell (see prior posting); Southern Nazarene University v. [read post]
