Search for: "COUNTS v. COUNTS" Results 1141 - 1160 of 20,588
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
23 Jun 2015, 11:01 am
§ 1125(a)• Count V: Common Law Unfair Competition• Count VI: Motion for Permanent Injunctive Relief Plaintiff asks the court for injunctive relief and damages. [read post]
4 May 2015, 8:36 am
Category: Recent Decisions;Contract Law Opinions Body: AC35503 - Coppola Construction Co. v. [read post]
23 Jan 2023, 12:20 am
Author Kamyar Ali Licence CC BY 2.0 Source Wikimedia CommonsSouth Park, Oxford Jane LambertPatents Count (Daniel Alexander KC) Oxford University Innovation Ltd v Oxford Nanoimaging Ltd [2022] EWHC 3200 (Pat) (23 Dec 2022)This was an action by Oxford University Innovations Ltd, ("OUI") to recover the royalties due under a licence agreement that it had entered with Oxford Nanoimaging Ltd. [read post]
17 Apr 2017, 7:06 pm by lcampbell@lawbc.com
§ 271(a) (Counts I-IV), the two copyright infringement counts (Counts V-VI), and a violation of the Unfair and Deceptive Trade Practices Act (N.C. [read post]
29 Oct 2024, 3:45 am
The Board pointed out that TFIP, when responding to the first sets, had "no duty to inform 1661 how it counted, i.e., that it counted some to be compound or have subparts. [read post]
11 Dec 2013, 12:27 pm
A copyright lawyer for PMA filed a complaint alleging the following: • Count I - Breach of Contract• Count II - Breach of Duty of Loyalty• Count III - Misappropriation of Trade Secrets• Count IV - Theft/Conversion• Count V - Tortious Interference with Prospective Business Relationship and Advantage• Count VI - Lanham Act Violations• Count VII - Unfair Competition PMA asks for preliminary and… [read post]
9 Apr 2009, 6:35 am
In the event that this fails to change the outcome, some Coleman supporters are urging him to file a federal suit invoking Bush v. [read post]
18 Aug 2006, 6:19 am
Sarah Johnson and Matt Edge successfully defended Judge Bornholdt's dismissal of five counts of aggravated criminal sodomy and five counts of rape based on statute of limitation grounds in State v. [read post]