Search for: "California v. Jones"
Results 1141 - 1160
of 1,312
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
19 Apr 2009, 9:08 pm
USA v Thomas, April 16, 2009.Editor's Note: Investigation began because of a Suspicious Activity Report. [read post]
19 Apr 2009, 6:00 am
The court also ordered appointment of counsel for plaintiff.In Jones v. [read post]
15 Apr 2009, 4:44 am
So medical monitoring in California doesn't appear to be a completely independent cause of action. [read post]
14 Apr 2009, 4:00 am
Recent Rulings Highlight the Possibility by Ashby Jones of the WSJ Law Blog Order Suppressing Privileged Communications in US V. [read post]
10 Apr 2009, 11:20 am
By Eric Goldman Trademarks/Domain Names * The ridiculous Jones Day v. [read post]
8 Apr 2009, 2:35 pm
Lindor's legal defense in UMG v. [read post]
8 Apr 2009, 12:57 pm
AGGREGATORS MAY FREELY REPRODUCE CALIFORNIA PUBLIC RECORDS - On February 5th, 2009, the California Court of Appeals for the Sixth Appellate District released its decision in California first Amendment Coalition v. [read post]
5 Apr 2009, 1:26 pm
On the day the plan was announced, the Dow Jones Industrial Average dropped 4.6%.[5] On February 17, 2009, President Obama signed the American Recovery and Reinvestment Act (the “Stimulus Act”), which provides $787 billion in government spending and tax cuts and also codifies (and in some cases expands) the Treasury Department’s restrictions on executive compensation.[6] Under the Stimulus Act, recipients of TARP funds must eliminate incentives that encourage… [read post]
5 Apr 2009, 5:10 am
Lindor's legal defense in UMG v. [read post]
23 Mar 2009, 1:26 pm
Inc. v. [read post]
27 Feb 2009, 7:00 am
: Kelly and another v GE Healthcare Ltd (IP finance) (Mis)appropriation of Wii and PlayStation brands to name medical disorders (IPKat) Is regulation of trade mark attorneys necessary? [read post]
25 Feb 2009, 11:53 am
Badgley and Nathan Jones In Shaw v. [read post]
20 Feb 2009, 9:44 am
Bement (2005) 36 Cal.4th 1075, 1087-88; Jones v. [read post]
10 Feb 2009, 10:27 am
California Coastal Commission In McAllister v. [read post]
4 Feb 2009, 8:18 am
In September, 2008, the ACLU asked the federal appeals court in California to reinstate the lawsuit. [read post]
3 Feb 2009, 4:00 am
Jan. 22, 2009)Affirming that multiple plaintiff claims of discrimination etc were frivolous and that a plaintiff's attorney engaged in sanctionable conduct; remanded $660K+ atty fees order for more refined computation of amounts>> Noted here: Central Ohio Employment Law Update7th Circuit>> Jones v City of Springfield, No. 08-2085 (7th cir. [read post]
1 Feb 2009, 6:05 am
Jones, 2009 U.S. [read post]
27 Jan 2009, 5:00 am
McElveen, of Jones Day. [read post]
20 Jan 2009, 9:26 am
By Nathan Jones and Cori Badgley In Fairbanks North Star Borough v. [read post]
13 Jan 2009, 9:32 am
By Nathan Jones and Leslie Z. [read post]
