Search for: "DOES 1-12" Results 1141 - 1160 of 28,896
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
18 Jul 2012, 11:41 am by rhall@initiativelegal.com
Jaguar Land Rover North America, LLC, No. 1-06-CV-075163 (Santa Clara Super. [read post]
10 Jan 2012, 2:12 am by John L. Welch
Rejecting Applicant's "double entendre" argument, the Board affirmed a Section 2(e)(1) refusal to register the mark LAPELLE, finding it merely descriptive of "leather for furniture. [read post]
22 May 2017, 5:15 pm by Kristen Clarke and Ezra Rosenberg
Rather, the court’s analysis proceeded to an examination of how the 50-percent-plus racial target actually affected the configuration of District 1, one of the two districts in question. [read post]
1 Oct 2016, 11:33 am by Sean Hanover
You may reach us at 1-800-579-9864 or admin@hanoverlawpc.com. [read post]
16 Jan 2015, 12:38 pm by John Jascob
The proposed rule does not exempt, however, any merger and acquisition broker that engages in certain excluded activities. [read post]
9 Jun 2014, 3:43 pm by EPLawyer
  In family law, you are taking 1 family and splitting it into 2. [read post]
9 Jun 2014, 3:43 pm by EPLawyer
  In family law, you are taking 1 family and splitting it into 2. [read post]
27 Dec 2007, 5:10 am
., 12/1/07), provides a generally good discussion of the differing standards concerning retaliation claims under the Fair Labor Standards Act (the "FLSA") (29 U.S.C. [read post]
2 Sep 2014, 4:04 pm by Lisa Larrimore Ouellette
The only school here that does not appear on both of the above lists is Illinois (Kesan, Heald, Wasserman).1. [read post]
8 Jan 2014, 9:30 am
When faced with a motion to strike affirmative defenses under Rule 12(f), Indiana federal courts apply a three-part test: (1) whether the matter is properly pled as an affirmative defense; (2) whether the affirmative defense complies with Federal Rules of Civil Procedure 8 and 9; and (3) whether the affirmative defense can withstand a Rule 12(b)(6) challenge. [read post]
7 Nov 2007, 7:50 am
Rubin - Evolution, Immigration and Trade - washingtonpost.com http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2007/05/07/... 1 of 3 5/12/2007 5:29 AMEvolution, Immigration and Trade By Paul H. [read post]
29 Dec 2016, 9:39 am by Eric Goldman
Sept. 12, 2016) Paragraph 1 of the injunction prohibits the use of marks beginning with “J-,” except pursuant to a fair use. [read post]
12 May 2013, 5:01 pm by oliver randl
Also the appellants submitted that due to a “release” of the activity of the original substance to the diluent during the multiple dilutions, the diluent of the dilutions referred to in claim 1 has properties which the undiluted diluent does not have. [read post]