Search for: "Dept of Corrections" Results 1141 - 1160 of 1,310
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
16 Feb 2024, 11:27 am by John Elwood
(relisted after the Jan. 5, Jan. 12 and Jan. 19 conferences) Missouri Dept. of Corrections v. [read post]
6 Apr 2020, 12:41 am by Peter Mahler
If it did, in theory the members holding a bare majority-in-interest could hold a new vote either to ratify the filing done in April 2018 by the one member, or to approve a new filing of a corrected Certificate of Revival assuming its acceptance by the Delaware Secretary of State. [read post]
1 Feb 2023, 12:22 pm by anne
  In a milestone case against a non-mortgage lender, the Dept. of Justice and the CFPB worked together to enforce against Trident Mortgage Company for systematically discriminating against neighborhoods and homeowners of color in and around Philadelphia. [read post]
20 May 2019, 9:24 am by Monica Williamson
Associate Prosecutor, Dept: Pueblo Courts / Prosecutor’s Office, Laguna, NM. [read post]
24 Jun 2019, 3:55 am by Edith Roberts
” And in North Carolina Dept of Revenue v. [read post]
15 Aug 2008, 5:40 pm
The trial court acted within its discretion in denying Husband's motion to correct error. [read post]
7 Feb 2018, 12:00 am by Public Employment Law Press
"2 The Court explained that “It is well established that "an arbitrator has broad discretion to determine a dispute and fix a remedy and that any contractual limitation on that discretion must be contained, either explicitly or incorporated by reference, in the arbitration clause itself'," citing Matter of State of New York [Dept. of Correctional Servs. [read post]
3 Aug 2018, 4:00 am by Public Employment Law Press
"4 The Court explained that “It is well established that "an arbitrator has broad discretion to determine a dispute and fix a remedy and that any contractual limitation on that discretion must be contained, either explicitly or incorporated by reference, in the arbitration clause itself'," citing Matter of State of New York [Dept. of Correctional Servs. [read post]
16 Nov 2007, 1:08 am
Dept. of Corrections).......................................15Trial Tr., Timberlake v. [read post]
16 Dec 2019, 4:00 am by Noel Semple
On October 25 & 26, Windsor Law proudly hosted the 2019 conference of the Canadian Association for Legal Ethics. [read post]
27 Aug 2011, 4:34 am
Superintendents of Dep't. of Correctional Servs.Court: U.S. 2nd Circuit Court of Appeals Docket: 08-2079 Opinion Date: August 19, 2011 Judge: Winter Areas of Law: Civil Rights, Class Action, Constitutional Law, Criminal Law, Government & Administrative Law Thirteen present and former female inmates of various New York state prisons appealed from the dismissal of their class action complaint brought under 42 U.S.C. 1983, seeking declaratory and injunctive relief compelling… [read post]
5 Apr 2007, 10:13 pm
District Court to determine whether Lee Gabriel and the Texas Court of Criminal Appeals were correct to deny Mr. [read post]
18 Nov 2022, 8:26 am by vforberger
I got angry and said, Are you trying to tell me that your agents aren’t responsible for giving the correct answers to the claimants? [read post]
24 Jan 2011, 11:25 am by Tana Fye
In my previous blog entry, I posted my proposal for amendments to the Indian Child Welfare Act. [read post]
2 Dec 2017, 1:39 pm by Wolfgang Demino
Here is a pleading template for a post-judgment motion to challenge a default judgment entered in favor of any one of the multiple National Collegiate Student Loan Trusts. [read post]
9 Nov 2014, 6:46 pm
Also, with the advent of parole, Congress moved toward a "three-way sharing" of sentencing responsibility by granting corrections personnel in the Executive Branch the discretion to release a prisoner before the expiration of the sentence imposed by the judge. * * *. . . . [read post]
27 Apr 2022, 1:12 pm by Public Employment Law Press
The primary questions before the Court of Appeal: Whether there was [1] a failure to follow the prescribed constitutional procedure that warrants invalidation of the results of the legislature's process followed in creating the congressional and state senate maps; and [2] whether there is record support for the determination of both courts below that the district lines for congressional races were drawn with an unconstitutional partisan intent. [read post]
27 Apr 2022, 1:12 pm by Public Employment Law Press
The primary questions before the Court of Appeal: Whether there was [1] a failure to follow the prescribed constitutional procedure that warrants invalidation of the results of the legislature's process followed in creating the congressional and state senate maps; and [2] whether there is record support for the determination of both courts below that the district lines for congressional races were drawn with an unconstitutional partisan intent. [read post]