Search for: "Deter v. Deter"
Results 1141 - 1160
of 5,286
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
26 May 2020, 3:11 pm
I concede that the procedural posture of this particular case -- an attorney who took $10,000 from a client to evaluate a medical malpractice lawsuit, didn't file anything, didn't return any of the money, defended a fee arbitration proceeding successfully, and then sued the client for malicious prosecution -- makes me somewhat inclined to the position advanced by the Court of Appeal, since an attorney defending against a fee dispute seems par for course and unlikely to require… [read post]
26 May 2020, 8:27 am
LLC v. [read post]
25 May 2020, 5:13 pm
” Florida East Coast Railway v. [read post]
22 May 2020, 1:31 pm
Moreno's Findings of Fact, Conclusions of Law and Order for Judgment in Parisi v. [read post]
21 May 2020, 9:59 am
In this respect, the ruling in Miracle-Pond, et al. v. [read post]
20 May 2020, 2:10 pm
Maybe it was a legislative error to say that frivolous anti-SLAPP motions should be sanctioned "under Section 128.5" -- they didn't anticipate that this would gut the ability to sanction and thereby deter such requests. [read post]
20 May 2020, 4:27 am
Therefore, as a general principle, Chinese courts do not consider a new claim if it is not raised in the appeal petition.[2] Double interest Australian courts do not enforce foreign punitive damages that aim to ‘penalise the [ ] defendant and to deter others from failing to comply with the Court’s orders’ (Schnabel v Lui [2002] NSWSC 15 at [176]). [read post]
19 May 2020, 9:30 am
(Beehan v. [read post]
18 May 2020, 5:03 pm
” Switzer v. [read post]
16 May 2020, 7:42 am
With interest I listened to the arguments and read the opinion in Padula-Wilson v. [read post]
12 May 2020, 6:55 am
(Castillo v. [read post]
11 May 2020, 9:01 pm
Last week, the Supreme Court unanimously reversed their convictions.Writing for the Court in Kelly v. [read post]
1 May 2020, 5:02 am
"] From Sarkisian v. [read post]
29 Apr 2020, 3:55 pm
This may deter late-filed nuisance claims. [read post]
29 Apr 2020, 3:55 pm
This may deter late-filed nuisance claims. [read post]
27 Apr 2020, 4:12 pm
That plea also supported the Claimant’s application that the hearing proceed in private, since there is an established principle that the court must adapt its procedures to ensure that it does not provide encouragement or assistance to blackmailers, and does not deter victims of blackmail from seeking justice from the courts (as is made clear in ZAM v CFM and TFW [2013] EWHC 662 (QB) at [39]-[41] and [44] and in LJY v Persons Unknown [2017] EWHC 3230 (QB) at [2]). [read post]
27 Apr 2020, 2:50 pm
The majority opinion in Brewer v. [read post]
27 Apr 2020, 4:47 am
Two of my pet topics — dysfunctional buy-sell agreements and application of federal court abstention doctrine in private company disputes — intersect in a decision issued last month in Ray v Raj Bedi Revocable Trust, Case No. 3:19-CV-711 DRL-MGG [N.D. [read post]
24 Apr 2020, 5:37 pm
Heller and McDonald v. [read post]
24 Apr 2020, 8:10 am
The lawsuit — Samma v. [read post]
