Search for: "Doe Defendants 1 to 20" Results 1141 - 1160 of 8,958
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
23 Oct 2017, 3:43 pm by W.F. Casey Ebsary, Jr.
§ 841(a)(1)"How Is the Weight Determined in Case of a Mixture in Drug Crimes? [read post]
21 Mar 2024, 12:10 pm by Robin E. Kobayashi
Exhibit 2 is a termination of leave of absence form dated December 31, 2002, that indicates applicant was discharged by defendant either 12/20/02 or 12/21/02. [read post]
6 Oct 2021, 6:46 am by Associates and Bruce L. Scheiner
Authorities say the defendant caused the collision through “reckless driving and actions. [read post]
10 Jun 2011, 2:36 pm by Jeffrey J. Randa
" The problem is, an answer like that only does 1 of 2 things: If true, it verifies the person has developed a tolerance to alcohol. [read post]
17 Jun 2011, 2:11 am by Kristina Araya
  The trial court scored the defendant’s PRVs and offense variables under the sentencing guidelines, resulting in a minimum range of 5-23 months in prison and a statutory maximum of 20 years. [read post]
20 Sep 2021, 1:03 pm by Kevin LaCroix
(There have in fact been 15 settlements of $1 billion or greater.) [read post]
28 Dec 2010, 6:20 am by Rebecca Tushnet
The principal ingredient of these is PS-20, 20% PS by weight. [read post]
9 May 2012, 12:46 pm
Petersburg Criminal Defense attorney, I have complied the 20 most frequently asked questions our clients have regarding their sealing/expunging their criminal record. 1. [read post]
14 Nov 2011, 3:11 am by Andrew Lavoott Bluestone
Defendants claim that Plaintiff does not sufficiently allege that Defendants substantially assisted Montesi's breach of fiduciary duty (Mot. to Dismiss at 19-20), and that Plaintiff fails to plead "actual knowledge" (Reply at 6-8). [read post]
5 Aug 2020, 12:42 pm by Shea Denning
The judge ordered the defendant to register as a sex offender for 30 years. (1) The defendant argued on appeal that the trial court lacked jurisdiction over the December 20 hearing because the presiding judge was not the “sentencing court” as contemplated by G.S. 14-202(l). [read post]
22 Jul 2006, 4:50 pm by The Owens Law Firm, P.L.L.C.
This rule does not apply if a trial court merely substitutes a court-appointed attorney to represent a defendant at a particular hearing, the defendant agrees to the substitution, and the original attorney does not object. [read post]
3 Jun 2014, 4:27 pm by Stephen Bilkis
Second, defendant was properly classified as a level-two sex offender. [read post]
29 Aug 2007, 5:23 am
Plaintiff's original state court Complaint alleges that Shell Oil Products U.S. and Does 1 to 20 "were residents or doing business in Contra Costa County. [read post]
11 Apr 2013, 9:37 am by Steven G. Pearl
Forever 21, Inc. (12/20/12) 212 Cal.App.4th 221, review granted 3/20/13 and briefing deferred pending Wisdom v. [read post]
24 Jun 2007, 3:15 pm
Under AB 510, sentencing enhancements no longer automatically double the sentence, but instead allow the district court to select a term of years between 1 and 20 years to be served consecutively to the underlying sentence. [read post]
8 Apr 2015, 5:28 am
  It then went on to note that[w]ith respect to first-degree retail fraud, the prosecution must prove beyond a reasonable doubt that: (1) `the defendant took some property that the store offered for sale;’ (2) `the defendant moved the property,’ with any movement being sufficient regardless of `whether the defendant actually got the property past the cashier or out of the store;’ (3) `the defendant intended to steal the… [read post]