Search for: "Doe Parties 1-100" Results 1141 - 1160 of 5,019
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
11 Nov 2019, 1:32 pm by Rob Robinson
PT) by dialing 1-800-319-4610 (toll-free) or +1-604-638-5340 (international). [read post]
17 May 2011, 6:15 am by Rebecca Tushnet
FLIR identified the false statements as (1) Sierra conducted an independent, third party test, and (2) “17 drops and counting …The ONLY rugged thermal imager,” conveying that FLIR cameras break immediately by contrast. [read post]
24 Aug 2011, 3:01 pm by Oliver G. Randl
In conclusion therefore, the board finds that the subject-matter of claim 1 of both requests does not involve an inventive step as required by A 52(1) and A 56.During the oral proceedings (OPs) held before the Board, he applicant had requested the Board to refer a question to the Enlarged Board (EBA):In the context of a computer-implemented gaming system, can a feature be regarded as a non-technical feature although the feature cannot exist and be put into practice outside… [read post]
25 Jun 2009, 8:33 am
Issues arise if one of you wants to sell your half to a third party, or if one of you becomes mentally disabled. [read post]
22 Jan 2011, 5:25 am by Gregory Forman
Still, the Reiss opinion offers a few interesting, and unanswered, questions: 1. [read post]
16 Nov 2011, 1:38 pm by Ted Allen
The USPX model proposal urges a company's board to adopt a proxy access bylaw that would permit director nominees from: any party of one or more shareowners that has held continuously, for two years, 1 percent of the company’s securities eligible to vote for the election of directors, and/or any party of shareowners of whom 100 or more satisfy SEC Rule 14a-8(b) eligibility requirements (i.e., those who hold at least a $2,000 stake for one year). [read post]
19 Dec 2011, 11:45 am
If you or someone you know does suffer a severe burn injury or a smoke inhalation injury, you should call Kramer & Pollack LLP in Mineola, New York so that the personal injury attorneys in that firm can determine whether another party has legal liability for injuries suffered, and if the injured party has a solid legal case. [read post]
10 Mar 2011, 10:23 pm by Dan
The U.S. does enforce Chinese arbitration awards, so arbitration in China does subject you to enforcement of a CIETAC arbitration award. 4. [read post]
19 May 2012, 11:01 am by Oliver
The Board did not come to the same conclusion:[2] In the Board’s view, the presence of the term “boundary portion” in claim 1 does not result in subject-matter extending beyond the content of the originally filed parent application so that, in this respect, the ground for opposition based on A 100(c) EPC 1973 does not prejudice the maintenance of the European patent. [2.1]  When the amendments examined as to their admissibility under A… [read post]
31 Jul 2019, 1:04 pm by Eric Goldman
Accepting plaintiffs’ argument would eviscerate Section 230(c)(1); a defendant interactive computer service would be ineligible for Section 230(c)(1) immunity by virtue of simply organizing and displaying content exclusively provided by third parties. [read post]
25 Oct 2010, 6:19 pm by David Oxenford
[Clarification - 10/26/2010 - Upon a close reading of the Terms Sheet, it looks like the phase in of the 1% royalty and the delay in the streaming discount only kick in if Congress does not mandate active FM chips in cell phones. [read post]
30 Nov 2018, 12:30 pm by John K. Ross
Trial Judge #1 holds one case must instead go to a different circuit; Trial Judge #2 holds the other does not. [read post]