Search for: "Doe v. Columbia University"
Results 1141 - 1160
of 1,335
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
6 Oct 2011, 6:02 pm
The experience in other jurisdictions such as British Columbia and Australia has shown that draft legislation tends to be watered-down in the final product due to strenuous opposition to anti-SLAPP legislation. [read post]
14 Sep 2020, 3:44 am
Bartenfelder v Bartenfelder, Nos. 0934, 2052 [Ct. [read post]
12 Nov 2007, 7:50 am
Below you will find the UCP affiliates for Maryland: UCP of Central Maryland 1700 Reiserstown Road, Suite 226 Baltimore, MD 21208-2935 Phone: (410) 484-4540; (800) 451-2452 (Toll Free/TDD) Fax: (410) 486-3825 E-mail: info@ucp-cm.org Web: http://www.ucp-cm.org Arbutus Development Center 1201 Maple Avenue Baltimore, MD 21227 Phone: (410) 247-4912 Coldspring Development Center 1111 East Coldspring Lane Baltimore, MD 21239 Phone: (410) 323-7261 Cumberland Center 12512 Nave's Crossroad, NE… [read post]
26 Aug 2018, 9:01 pm
As a court of appeals judge, Judge Kavanaugh was required to construe and apply Justice Antonin Scalia’s 2008 majority opinion in District of Columbia v. [read post]
29 Jan 2023, 4:00 am
Finally, the doctrine of standing appears in the public debt context as it does in appropriations, with federal courts holding (Flast v. [read post]
11 Mar 2024, 6:30 am
But that, obviously, does not prevent a state from deciding that no one should vote or, more to the point, that everyone should experience inconvenient hurdles to casting their ballots. [read post]
21 Feb 2015, 12:01 am
In Rasul v. [read post]
23 Jan 2023, 7:30 am
Their images should be treated with the same scorn as those depicting Chief Justice Roger Taney, the author of the execrable decision in Dred Scott v. [read post]
27 Jan 2012, 2:21 pm
Under section 5(e) of the CPA: (e) there is a representative plaintiff or defendant who, (i) would fairly and adequately represent the interests of the class, (ii) has produced a plan for the proceeding that sets out a workable method of advancing the proceeding on behalf of the class and of notifying class members of the proceeding, and (iii) does not have, on the common issues for the class, an interest in conflict with the interests of other class members. 1992, c. [read post]
1 May 2020, 12:32 pm
See, e.g., United States v. [read post]
31 Jan 2015, 8:24 pm
(Pix (c) Larry Catá Backer 2015) Professor James Stewart, of the Faculty of Law at the University of British Columbia, has produced a valuable on line symposium: Business and Human Rights: Next Steps. [read post]
9 May 2024, 11:30 am
Wade, Griswold v. [read post]
19 Jul 2022, 5:54 am
Does he have any concept of truth as that term is used in our society? [read post]
1 Apr 2024, 7:24 am
The problem with this standard is that it does not make all property owners “whole. [read post]
16 Jun 2020, 5:14 am
Lucy, an African American graduate student, enrolled at the University of Alabama in Tuscaloosa, pursuant to a court order in the case of Lucy v. [read post]
27 May 2013, 9:01 pm
In a recent ruling, in Gartner v. [read post]
16 Mar 2017, 6:24 pm
The Justice Department was clearly aware of this, writing in filings in both the Western District of Washington and the District of Columbia that “the New Executive Order does not present a need for emergency litigation. [read post]
9 Apr 2010, 1:23 pm
Comcast Corp. v. [read post]
8 Jul 2014, 4:20 am
In American Pipe & Construction Co. v. [read post]
1 Jul 2017, 12:00 pm
Most notably, in Hoyt v. [read post]
