Search for: "Downs v. USA" Results 1141 - 1160 of 1,797
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
16 Jun 2012, 1:02 pm by Andis Kaulins
See in this regard our 2003 posting at Attorney Advertising in the USA and the Bates Case and our 2004 posting at Money to Burn - Judge Zagel, Robins et al., M. [read post]
15 Jun 2012, 3:26 am by SHG
The 4th Circuit's decision came in a little-noticed drug case, United States v. [read post]
14 Jun 2012, 7:15 am by Cormac Early
Schwinn discusses the Court’s denial of certiorari in Lebron v. [read post]
12 Jun 2012, 12:30 pm by Daniel Schwartz
Thus, every reference to this lawsuit going forward will be “Hardwick v. [read post]
8 Jun 2012, 1:34 pm by David Harlow
#hcdc #dchealth http://pic.twitter.com/UVnUIO57”Trish DohertyRT @healthblawg: #theWalkingGallery on a Lego map of the USA. [read post]
8 Jun 2012, 10:27 am
Nat'l Grid USA/Narragansett Electric, in which the Rhode Island Supreme Court affirmed the decision handed down by the Workers' Compensation Court Appellate Division. [read post]
8 Jun 2012, 10:11 am
 Britax Childcare Pty Ltd v Infa-Secure Pty Ltd [2012] FCA 467. [read post]
6 Jun 2012, 6:37 am by Conor McEvily
Supreme Court strikes down the Affordable Care Act this month. [read post]
30 May 2012, 1:37 pm by Peter Rost
Senate, Governor of Indiana, Governor of Montana, Maryland Senate, Vermont Senate, New York City Council, Southern Medical Association, ESOMAR, NC Pharmacy Association, The Prescription Access Litigation Project, Minnesota Senior Federation, Danske Bank, Sveriges Riksdag, Sveriges Radio Sommar, Svenska Nyhetsbrev AB, Entreprenörsdagen, Stockholms Läns Landsting, Läkemedelskommittén i Jämtlands län, Gräv 08-Undersökande Journalister,… [read post]
29 May 2012, 8:08 pm
It was hot news yesterday but it will be even hotter today: the Court of Appeal decision in the first round of the Apple v Samsung tablet litigation in England and Wales will be handed down later today. [read post]
29 May 2012, 10:02 am by Lyle Denniston
   The Court also turned down the latest in a series of appeals by persons seeking to revive their damages lawsuit against the Iranian government for holding them or members of their family hostage in 1979 and 1980 (Roeder, et al., v. [read post]
28 May 2012, 5:08 am by Anita Davies
However, the judgment in Lukaszewski & Ors, R (Halligen) v Secretary of State for the Home Department [2012] UKSC 20, handed down by the Supreme Court last week, appears to offer a ray of hope to applicants facing short time limits. [read post]
23 May 2012, 6:13 am by Conor McEvily
Gutierrez and Holder v. [read post]
22 May 2012, 9:39 am
So I can see preferring an "In Re" case over an "X v. [read post]
20 May 2012, 2:00 am by Rachit Buch
For example, will the serious harm test be more onerous than the current need for a tort to be real and substantial, as set out in Jameel v Dow Jones [2005] EWCA Civ 75, or the “threshold of seriousness” considered in Cook v Telegraph [2011] EWHC 1519 (QB)? [read post]