Search for: "ENGLISH v. STATE"
Results 1141 - 1160
of 6,446
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
16 Nov 2016, 4:00 am
Montgomery v. [read post]
8 May 2013, 3:00 am
Maclean v. [read post]
1 May 2019, 4:00 am
Platnick v. [read post]
25 Jul 2015, 4:30 am
The latest episode of the UK saga “and what do we do with data retention laws” has been issued by the English High Court, with its judgement in the case David Davis and Ors v The Secretary of State for the Home Department [2015] EWHC 2092 (Admin). [read post]
14 Apr 2021, 4:00 am
Honda Canada Inc. v. [read post]
18 Jul 2011, 3:39 am
Supreme Court Home Office v Tariq [2011] UKSC 35 (13 July 2011) Al Rawi & Ors v The Security Service & Ors [2011] UKSC 34 (13 July 2011) Court of Appeal (Civil Division) Brighton and Hove City Council v PM & Ors [2011] EWCA Civ 795 (12 July 2011) Pannone LLP v Aardvark Digital Ltd [2011] EWCA Civ 803 (12 July 2011) Jones & Anor v Ruth & Anor [2011] EWCA Civ 804 (12 July 2011) Shovelar & Ors v Lane & Ors… [read post]
16 Mar 2022, 7:39 pm
Russian Federation Asset Language: English/French Summary: The International Court of Justice (ICJ), the principal judicial organ of the UN, delivers its Order on the Request for the indication of provisional measures… [read post]
26 Jun 2015, 12:30 am
Floyd LJ has roundly rejected Arnold J's reasoning, stating:58.The difficulty I feel with endorsing this reasoning is as follows. [read post]
1 Nov 2011, 5:07 am
It has also been noted that, just as the English frequently fail at penalties, the Germans excel in them. [read post]
19 Oct 2022, 4:00 am
For this last week, the three most-consulted English-language decisions were: 1. [read post]
26 Jan 2014, 7:24 am
It is an ordinary English word and should be construed as such. [read post]
26 Mar 2010, 8:20 am
On Thursday, 18 March 2010, the weblog of the Journal of Intellectual Property Law and Practice published a piece of news under the title “Exclusive jurisdiction clauses and antisuit injunctions”, on a new English case on anti-suit injunctions under the Brussels Regulation (the “other” State being a third State). [read post]
6 Feb 2019, 4:27 am
Novelty of claim 1 was attacked based upon United States Patent No. 5,058,198 to Rocci. [read post]
11 Apr 2011, 10:00 pm
See paras 23 – 29 of R (English UK Ltd) v Secretary of State for the Home Department [2010] EWHC 1726 for a further explanation of the workings of PBS. [read post]
20 Jun 2011, 9:00 am
TREATY ON EXTRADITION AND MUTUAL ASSISTANCE IN CRIMINAL MATTERS BETWEEN THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA AND THE REPUBLIC OF TURKEY AMERIKA BIRLESIK DEVLETLERI ILE TURKIYE CUMHURIYETI ARASINDA SUCLULARIN GERI VERILMESI CEZA ISLERINDE KARSILIKLI YARDIM ANLASMASI BY THE PRESIDENT OF THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA A PROCLAMATION CONSIDERING THAT: The Treaty on Extradition and Mutual Assistance in Criminal Matters between the United States of America and the Republic of Turkey,… [read post]
23 Jul 2015, 4:50 pm
However the English decisions of Bunt v Tilley ([2007] 1 WLR 1243) and Metropolitan International had expressed a contrary view. [read post]
21 Jan 2015, 4:00 am
Leggat v. [read post]
4 Jul 2018, 2:23 am
it cannot make sense for the courts of another member state to give effect to a “reorganisation measure” but not to other provisions of the law of the home state affecting its operation. [read post]
