Search for: "ENGLISH v. STATE"
Results 1141 - 1160
of 7,356
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
13 Sep 2009, 6:06 am
See Benefield, 160 So. 2d at 710 (stating that section 901.19 "appears to represent a codification of the English common law which recognized the fundamental sanctity of one's home"); State v. [read post]
9 Jun 2015, 5:25 am
United States, involving the prosecution of threats made on Facebook, was “something of an anticlimax. [read post]
4 May 2011, 1:00 pm
ARTICLE V A fugitive criminal shall not be surrendered under the provisions hereof, when, from lapse of time or other lawful cause, according to the laws of the place within the jurisdiction of which the crime was committed, the criminal is exempt from prosecution or punishment for the offense for which the surrender is asked. [read post]
2 Feb 2016, 9:33 am
The Supreme Court disagreed and stated that there were no provisions in the CMR that state that all closely connected claims must be brought under one set of proceedings. [read post]
21 May 2019, 3:53 am
This gives effect to the most basic principle of natural justice which has been the foundation of the English legal system for centuries. [read post]
8 Apr 2010, 4:55 am
Disciplinary charges allege use of inappropriate languageBernstein v Norwich City School District, 282 A.D.2d 70, leave to appeal denied, 96 N.Y.2d 937In May 1998 Richard C. [read post]
5 Oct 2011, 5:37 pm
And does it necessarily imply a draconian framework of state interference? [read post]
16 Dec 2016, 5:02 am
The post JORDAN v. [read post]
8 Nov 2010, 6:31 am
In February this year, the English courts appeared finally to have woken up to the arrival of the Rome II Regulation, with the first published decision addressing its provisions. [read post]
18 Apr 2019, 4:47 am
In doing so, the Judge relied on several authorities including the judgment of Popplewell J in Thai-Lao Lignite (Thailand) v Government of Lao [2013]. [read post]
16 Jun 2018, 12:25 pm
Of course, this does not mean that claimants will receive no redress from the English courts in a case where an arbitration agreement has been breached through proceedings brought in the courts of another EU member state. [read post]
13 Jun 2011, 9:00 am
ARTICLE V A. [read post]
16 Dec 2015, 3:10 am
He stated that refusal to permit disclosure to the ECtHR does not constitute a breach of international law. [read post]
3 Aug 2016, 2:53 am
The scheme provided that victims could claim compensation directly from the designated compensation body in their own member state, in certain circumstances. [read post]
13 Jun 2022, 11:30 pm
This blog was co-authored by Bwanika Lwanga, Candidate Attorney The English judgment of Butler-Sloss & Ors v The Charity Commission for England and Wales & Anor [2022] EWHC 974 (Ch), considered the question of whether the trustees of two charitable trusts could adopt investment policies that exclude profitable potential investments on the basis that the investments would conflict with the principal purposes of the charities which are environmental protection and the relief… [read post]
25 May 2011, 9:35 pm
Rick Nemcik Cruz kindly provided an English-language summary:Thank you very much for keeping me informed. [read post]
7 Jul 2022, 11:06 pm
Ardavan Arzandeh, “Brownlie II and The Service-Out Jurisdiction under English Law” FS Cairo (Nile Plaza) LLC v Brownlie (Brownlie II) is arguably the United Kingdom’s highest appellate court’s most significant decision this century on a private international law question. [read post]
9 Jan 2008, 10:41 am
In United States v Gomez Castrillon, 2007 U.S. [read post]
3 Nov 2010, 4:01 am
(On the application of) v Secretary of State for Energy and Climate Change & Anor [2010] EWHC 2752 (Admin) (02 November 2010) Source: www.bailii.org [read post]
