Search for: "Ex parte Cross"
Results 1141 - 1160
of 1,666
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
11 Oct 2023, 5:51 am
Editor’s Note: This is part of a multi-part series on the FISA Section 702 reauthorization and reform debate. [read post]
14 Aug 2019, 5:27 am
On July 6, 2017, petitioner petitioned the trial court for an ex parte PPO against respondent. [read post]
5 Oct 2020, 6:08 am
Based, in part, on the defendant=s egregious fault, the court awarded the plaintiff 75% of the net proceeds from the sale of the marital residence and 60% of the parties= investment and bank accounts and of the marital contributions to the defendant=s deferred compensation plan. [read post]
21 Mar 2010, 5:16 am
Because there is no showing that Laich was reasonably suspected of criminal activity related to his border crossing, the Government cannot justify its seizure of Laich's laptop as part of an extended border search. [read post]
17 Jun 2013, 3:37 pm
Therefore R (Ex p McLellan) v Bracknell Forest BC [2001] 33 HLR 86 should be followed, the appeal hearing was not a formal hearing, there was no obligation to provide witness statements or schedules of allegations. [read post]
3 Jan 2016, 4:04 pm
He noted that there been cross-examination of the claimant and that the total costs of the exercise were over £170,000. [read post]
17 Jun 2013, 3:37 pm
Therefore R (Ex p McLellan) v Bracknell Forest BC [2001] 33 HLR 86 should be followed, the appeal hearing was not a formal hearing, there was no obligation to provide witness statements or schedules of allegations. [read post]
9 Nov 2014, 6:46 pm
Ex parte United States, 242 U.S. 27, 37 S.Ct. 72, 61 L.Ed. 129 (1916). [read post]
18 Jul 2021, 4:58 pm
These truths, combined with the fact that ex parte conferences threaten the sanctity of the physician-patient relationship while producing no additional information (other than that which is already obtainable through the regular methods of discovery), compel us to find that modern public policy prohibits ex parte conferences between a plaintiff’s treating physician and defense counsel. [read post]
1 Jun 2011, 7:15 pm
Judge Tozzi asked how to reconcile Kahanamoku and Ex Parte Milligan with the Ali case, to which Kazin noted that neither of those appellants served with the land or naval forces, plus they were subjected to military commissions versus a court-martial.Kazin’s argument necessarily relied heavily on individual trial judges’ findings of fact in divining such issues as when does Article 2 jurisdiction over contractors end. [read post]
4 Apr 2023, 2:20 am
30-34 Choi, Sung-Soo “Review of the several issues of the Convention on the Recognition and Enforcement of Foreign Judgments”, Gachon Law Review 14 (2021), pp. 37-68 (available here) Clavel, Sandrine ; Jault-Seseke, Fabienne “La convention de La Haye du 2 juillet 2019 sur la reconnaissance et l’exécution des jugements étrangers en matière civile ou commerciale : Que peut-on en attendre ? [read post]
26 Aug 2022, 4:00 am
“What is part of the amendment that might be looked at by the FEC are what the changes are and what the additional amounts are,” Martin said. [read post]
4 Jun 2021, 4:00 am
The ex-girlfriend patched Gaetz into the call. [read post]
15 Jul 2018, 9:30 pm
Whether or not one believes that it is always improper for judicial actors to engage in that kind of commentary ex cathedra —which would be a fairly aggressive position to take—there is certainly a line, and that line gets crossed all the time. [read post]
3 Apr 2016, 11:01 am
No person who was not a descendant (for instance, an ex-spouse) would be allowed to own voting units. [read post]
24 May 2007, 2:03 pm
"E-government" has entered the chattering class's lexicon, says Michael Cross. [read post]
3 Apr 2018, 10:19 am
One odd part of the ruling is that the court does not discuss in detail the effect of plaintiffs’ status as academics. [read post]
3 Apr 2016, 11:01 am
No person who was not a descendant (for instance, an ex-spouse) would be allowed to own voting units. [read post]
10 Dec 2023, 4:59 am
Cross-disciplinary and comparative papers are particularly welcomed. [read post]
16 Feb 2011, 3:35 am
That's not why I'm writing; as a civil litigator, though, this part from ATL’s post piqued my interest: Does this mean that Ung gets his life back? [read post]
