Search for: "FAIR v. THE STATE" Results 1141 - 1160 of 30,511
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
17 Jun 2013, 2:05 pm by Kevin Russell
This morning the Court issued its decision in Maracich v. [read post]
20 Jan 2011, 10:17 am by tjsllibrary
References Forced entry: Is a controversial state law a missing piece in treating mental illness? [read post]
7 Jun 2011, 7:08 am
Supreme Court Justice Sunni Stromberg-Stein, in a recent decision in R. v. [read post]
3 Aug 2011, 12:36 am by Richard Mumford
Sign up to free human rights updates by email, Facebook, Twitter or RSS Related posts A very controversial kiss Human rights in some but not all disciplinary hearings at work, rules Supreme Court Doctors not entitled to be judged by independent panel Admissibility of hearsay evidence at General Medical Council hearing breached right to fair trial Teacher subject to disciplinary proceedings entitled to legal representation if his name is to be added to children protection… [read post]
So, the fair hearing has a higher burden of proof than the initial investigation (fair preponderance of evidence v. some credible evidence). [read post]
28 Jun 2014, 5:25 pm by INFORRM
On 18 June 2014 the Supreme Court handed down judgment in R (T) v Secretary of State for the Home Department [2014] UKSC 35. [read post]
20 Mar 2017, 8:02 am by MBettman
” Supreme Court of Ohio Decision: OK To Try Anderson Again On September 14, 2016, the Supreme Court of Ohio handed down a merit decision, State v. [read post]
29 Aug 2024, 7:07 am by Daniel M. Kowalski
NIPNLG, Aug. 29, 2024 " IMPORTANT UPDATE: PROPOSED SETTLEMENT AGREEMENT PRELIMINARILY APPROVED J.O.P. v. [read post]
9 Nov 2022, 10:22 am by INFORRM
United States Supreme Court Gonzalez v Google and Twitter v Taamneh. [read post]
6 Sep 2020, 7:03 am by Eric Goldman
Longarzo * DMCA’s Unhelpful 512(f) Preempts Helpful State Law Claims–Stevens v. [read post]
7 Feb 2017, 11:45 am by Robert Loeb
On February 2, 2017, the New York Appellate Division, First Department, issued a decision in Gordon v. [read post]