Search for: "Federal Defender" Results 1141 - 1160 of 98,954
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
23 Jun 2024, 4:26 pm by Benson Varghese
Criminal History: The defendant’s criminal history is scored, resulting in a Criminal History Category (I to VI). [read post]
23 Jun 2024, 4:26 pm by Benson Varghese
Criminal History: The defendant’s criminal history is scored, resulting in a Criminal History Category (I to VI). [read post]
23 Jun 2024, 12:33 pm by Josh Blackman
I spent two years clerking in the federal district court, and then one year in the circuit court. [read post]
23 Jun 2024, 6:12 am by Rob Robinson
Resources from the Federal Trade Commission (FTC) offer valuable training materials and support to bolster cybersecurity measures. [read post]
23 Jun 2024, 3:00 am by Yosi Yahoudai
The Rahimi decision relied in part on a finding that Zackey Rahimi, the defendant, was dangerous. [read post]
22 Jun 2024, 1:22 pm by Hanlon Law, PA
Case Setting Allegedly, in February 2013, the defendant pleaded guilty to possession with intent to distribute cocaine in violation of federal law. [read post]
22 Jun 2024, 11:59 am by Arfaa Law Group
The primary issue addressed was the plaintiff’s failure to properly serve the defendants as required by Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 4. [read post]
It requires an injury in fact that is fairly traceable to a defendant’s conduct and the potential for redress or remedy from the court. [read post]
22 Jun 2024, 7:16 am by Benson Varghese
” Diaz argued that this testimony violated Federal Rule of Evidence 704(b), which prohibits expert witnesses from opining on a defendant’s mental state in criminal cases. [read post]
22 Jun 2024, 7:16 am by Benson Varghese
” Diaz argued that this testimony violated Federal Rule of Evidence 704(b), which prohibits expert witnesses from opining on a defendant’s mental state in criminal cases. [read post]
22 Jun 2024, 7:16 am by Benson Varghese
” Diaz argued that this testimony violated Federal Rule of Evidence 704(b), which prohibits expert witnesses from opining on a defendant’s mental state in criminal cases. [read post]
22 Jun 2024, 6:30 am
  And the Federal District Court for the Northern District of Texas agreed—at least as to Arjuna. [read post]
22 Jun 2024, 6:30 am
  And the Federal District Court for the Northern District of Texas agreed—at least as to Arjuna. [read post]
22 Jun 2024, 5:00 am by ricelawmd_3p2zve
The same issues would arise, as the federal court would lack jurisdiction over the defendant and action. [read post]
22 Jun 2024, 4:00 am by jonathanturley
The prosecutor admitted that he had never seen an agreement this generous for a defendant. [read post]
22 Jun 2024, 3:00 am by Yosi Yahoudai
” “Excluding such evidence would only serve to distort the truth and leave the jury with the mistaken impression that only defendant Kamon is to blame for such misappropriation when, in truth, defendant Girardi similarly misappropriated tens of millions himself,” the prosecutors wrote. [read post]
21 Jun 2024, 5:47 pm by Josh Blackman
Our interest is not necessarily the same as that of the defendant who was convicted in this case, and our claim is more broad than that, Mr. [read post]
21 Jun 2024, 5:47 pm by Yosi Yahoudai
Attorneys with the San Francisco public defender’s office, which represented DePape, successfully sought to have several charges against him dismissed in the state case, arguing that they were similar to those he had been convicted of in federal court. [read post]