Search for: "Fisher v. State "
Results 1141 - 1160
of 2,027
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
16 Aug 2012, 4:06 am
By Dennis Crouch Magsil Corp. and MIT v. [read post]
15 Aug 2012, 9:41 am
The case has set the stage for the first big affirmative action battle since the Supreme Court's 2003 decision in Grutter v. [read post]
15 Aug 2012, 6:43 am
Today’s coverage of the Court focuses on the myriad amicus briefs filed earlier this week in Fisher v. [read post]
14 Aug 2012, 11:29 am
On Monday, Constitutional Accountability Center filed an amici curiae brief in the Supreme Court in Fisher v. [read post]
14 Aug 2012, 6:56 am
The federal government filed an amicus brief yesterday in Fisher v. [read post]
13 Aug 2012, 1:05 pm
The Court will hold a hearing on the case of Fisher v. [read post]
13 Aug 2012, 6:40 am
Daniel Fisher of Forbes previews the arguments in Lozman v. [read post]
12 Aug 2012, 6:30 am
Association v. [read post]
10 Aug 2012, 6:27 am
Rosenberg of the National Review Online reviews the brief filed by the University of Texas in Fisher v. [read post]
9 Aug 2012, 12:46 pm
But in the high court's 2009 Arizona v. [read post]
9 Aug 2012, 7:30 am
Interested in the "State of Texas Non-Competes"? [read post]
9 Aug 2012, 5:00 am
United States Surgical Corp. [read post]
7 Aug 2012, 9:01 am
Yesterday the University of Texas at Austin filed its brief on the merits in Fisher v. [read post]
6 Aug 2012, 5:08 pm
"UT Austin's Consideration of Race in Admissions is Narrow, Necessary and Constitutional": The University of Texas at Austin today issued a news release that begins, "Today, the University of Texas at Austin filed its brief to the United States Supreme Court as respondent in the case of Fisher v. [read post]
6 Aug 2012, 8:50 am
Pomeroy (Pacific Legal Foundation - Program for Judicial Awareness and Pacific Legal Foundation) have posted Desperately Seeking Scrutiny: Why the Supreme Court Should Use Fisher v. [read post]
6 Aug 2012, 2:56 am
This means that it is again necessary for exchange control approval to be obtained when any intellectual property is assigned to an offshore entity.Source: "Exchange Control Regulations amended in response to Oilwell decision" by Megan Reimers (Spoor & Fisher, Pretoria), Trademark Law Review, 30 July 2012 [read post]
2 Aug 2012, 3:33 am
Fisher, 36 AD3d 486 [1st Dept 20071, but see, Amalfitano v. [read post]
1 Aug 2012, 11:11 am
Given that Caron diverges from Fisher v. [read post]
1 Aug 2012, 8:05 am
” The cases are USA v David Nosal in the 9th U.S. [read post]
