Search for: "GORDON v GORDON" Results 1141 - 1160 of 2,592
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
6 Nov 2017, 1:00 am by Matrix Legal Support Service
Gordon & Ors as Trustees of the Inter Vivos Trust of the late William Strathdee Gordon v Campbell Riddell Breeze Paterson LLP (Scotland), heard 19 Jul 2017. [read post]
27 Jul 2018, 4:30 am by Andrew Lavoott Bluestone
“On a motion to dismiss under CPLR 3211, the pleading is to be given a liberal construction, the allegations contained within it are assumed to be true and the plaintiff is to be afforded every favorable inference” (Simkin v Blank, 19 NY3d 46, 52; see Leon v Martinez, 84 NY2d 83, 87; Hershco v Gordon & Gordon, 155 AD3d 1007, 1008). [read post]
25 May 2012, 9:20 am by Daniel E. Cummins
Schoffstall, Uninsured/Underinsured Litigation after IFP v. [read post]
8 Dec 2010, 3:01 am by Andrew Lavoott Bluestone
Rosner v Paley, 65 NY2d 736, 738 [1985]; Zarin v Reid & Priest, 184 AD2d 385, 386-387 [1992]). [read post]
19 Jul 2023, 12:25 pm by Lawrence Solum
Further, the Supreme Court recently denied cert in Gordon College v. [read post]
31 Jul 2018, 4:26 am by Andrew Lavoott Bluestone
Moreover, to the extent that the plaintiff’s action may be premature because, while the underlying action is pending, it cannot be determined whether the defendant’s alleged legal malpractice proximately caused the plaintiff to sustain damages (see generally Shumsky v Eisenstein, 96 NY2d 164, 166; Ackerman v Price Waterhouse, 84 NY2d 535, 542-543; Hershco v Gordon & Gordon, 155 AD3d 1006; Stein Indus., Inc.… [read post]
10 Feb 2017, 3:50 pm by Kysa Crusco
The Takeaway The conclusion of husband’s brief, artfully written by Attorney Joshua Gordon, argues: “It is not reasonable to suggest, in these times of protracted discovery and litigation, that a party to a divorce must remain celibate for the duration of the proceedings – here already longer than four years. [read post]
16 May 2019, 1:40 pm by Dr. Virginia Cervieri
Virginia CervieriThe Uruguayan Criminal Court of First Instance Specialized in Organized Crime has ordered internet service providers (ISPs) to block websites that retransmit sporting events illegally, thereby infringing the copyright to this content (Fox International Channels v. [read post]