Search for: "Germany v. Germany" Results 1141 - 1160 of 4,533
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
12 Jun 2014, 10:59 pm by INFORRM
Having regard to the margin of appreciation enjoyed by national courts, the Court applied the criteria set out in von Hannover v Germany (No.2) (2012) 55 EHRR 15 and Axel Springer AG v Germany [2012] ECHR 227 as relevant for the balancing exercise between Articles 8 and 10: Contribution to a debate of general interest A distinction had to be made between the core message of the article and the details contained therein. [read post]
16 Sep 2014, 1:17 pm
See Judgment in Apple Inc. v Deutsches Patent- und Markenamt, C-421/13, paragraph 17 [10 July 2014]. [read post]
21 Feb 2011, 11:02 am
 The case is Oracle v UsedSoft, in which Europe's top court is being invited to rule on whether downloaded software may be traded as "used". [read post]
8 Sep 2016, 6:24 am by Verena von Bomhard
While more flexible than what has been seen to be the case in Belgium, also in Germany, reimbursement tends to lag significantly behind the actual (and usual) costs, certainly in patent cases. [read post]
15 May 2012, 8:54 am by Suzanne Ito
Tomorrow, the European Court of Human Rights (ECtHR), Europe's top human rights court based in Strasbourg, France, will hear arguments in El-Masri v. [read post]
30 Jun 2008, 6:18 pm
With representatives from the United States, United Kingdom, Finland, Australia, Germany, India and many more countries, it truly lived up to both its name and its stated goal. [read post]
3 Mar 2015, 10:00 pm by Jan von Hein
By Dina Reis, Albert-Ludwigs-University Freiburg (Germany) In its ruling of 10 December 2014 (Case XII ZB 463/13), the German Federal Court of Justice (Bundesgerichtshof – BGH) had to decide whether, despite the domestic prohibition of surrogacy, a foreign judgment granting legal parenthood to the intended parents of a child born as a result of a surrogacy arrangement should be recognized. [read post]
20 Aug 2012, 7:30 am
RTL also joined the already-pending nullity action in Deutsche Telekom AG v THE Patent GmbH, Baden Baden, Germany (the registered owner of European Patent EP 1 147 654) on 1 March 2012. [read post]
10 Mar 2017, 9:14 am by Rebecca Tushnet
RT: Fromer has written about peripheral v. core claiming in © v. patent: derivative works right differs, and the court may be the first time you get an interpretation of the meaning v. more substantive examination for patent.Malcolm L. [read post]