Search for: "Ginsburg v. United States" Results 1141 - 1160 of 2,908
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
24 Sep 2009, 5:53 am
The Los Angeles Times continues the discussion over United States v. [read post]
16 Oct 2017, 8:55 am by Amy Howe
The highest-profile grant of the day came in United States v. [read post]
11 Oct 2016, 3:44 am by Edith Roberts
United States, the federal bank fraud case that was also argued last week. [read post]
9 Jul 2018, 2:31 pm by Colby Pastre
Hence Scalia and Thomas siding with Justices Ginsburg and Kagan in 2014 to let Maryland impose double taxes on residents with out-of-state investments. [read post]
17 May 2010, 7:06 am by Erin Miller
 The rulings are: In United States v. [read post]
5 Jul 2016, 3:03 pm by Mark Graber
University of Texas at Austin, permanently enjoined the enforcement of Obama administration immigration policies in United States v. [read post]
11 Feb 2020, 8:17 pm by Bona Law PC
United, Inc., the Supreme Court has “consistently stated” that “’the immediate buyers from the alleged antitrust violators’ may maintain a suit against the antitrust violators. [read post]
10 Feb 2017, 1:14 pm by Peter Margulies
We know that because the four liberal Justices (Breyer, Ginsburg, Sotomayor, and Kagan) dissented from the Court’s deferential decision in Kerry v. [read post]
19 May 2008, 7:09 am
  The decision came on a 7-2 vote in United States v. [read post]
21 Feb 2018, 3:33 am by Edith Roberts
United States, which asks when erroneous applications of the U.S. [read post]
6 Nov 2008, 8:45 pm
We've had a chance now to read - no, make that "study" - the Wyeth v. [read post]
14 Jan 2019, 3:48 am by Edith Roberts
Wyoming, “an Indian treaty-rights case argued in the Supreme Court last Tuesday, revolves around a basic of federal Indian law: No promise to Indian people actually binds the United States. [read post]
7 Dec 2017, 1:50 pm by Susan C. Morse
§ 1503,  which was limited with a pending-proceeding requirement in United States v. [read post]
26 Jun 2011, 7:27 am by Jonathan H. Adler
United States, in which the Court held that trial courts could not impose longer criminal sentences for the purpose of rehabilitation. [read post]
1 Mar 2007, 10:20 am
On Tuesday, the Court heard argument in Winkelman v. [read post]
7 Jun 2010, 7:26 am by Erin Miller
Thomas No. 09-940, United States v. [read post]