Search for: "Givens v. Givens"
Results 1141 - 1160
of 67,490
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
5 Apr 2022, 9:19 am
DocName=075000050HPt%2E+V&ActID=2086&ChapterID=59&SeqStart=6200000&SeqEnd=8675000 Read More [read post]
29 Sep 2013, 10:54 am
In Jewel v. [read post]
5 Dec 2013, 3:17 pm
., where the Bureau does not have direct enforcement powers given the existence of legislation or regulations sanctioning conduct that would otherwise violate the Competition Act). [read post]
30 Aug 2016, 7:56 am
So the other particularly fascinating item – to me, anyway – that popped up in my twitter feed while I was on vacation was this important decision by the Ninth Circuit, Demer v. [read post]
20 Jun 2010, 6:40 pm
Indeed, given the issues involved, and the potential for damage, it was probably the best that the Court could have done. [read post]
17 Jun 2023, 7:08 am
Doe 1 v. [read post]
24 Nov 2019, 10:10 am
The case of R (Miller) v The Prime Minister and Cherry v Advocate General for Scotland dealt with whether the advice given by the UK Prime Minister to Her Majesty the Queen to prorogue Parliament (that is, discontinue its session) for a number of days between September and October 2019 was lawful. [read post]
30 Nov 2012, 8:55 pm
Citing its 2002 decision in Timmons v. [read post]
12 Sep 2014, 3:25 am
Member States are also required to ensure that, where this is not given, appropriate measures are put in place to protect the consumer. [read post]
19 Oct 2010, 5:25 am
To view a copy of the Appellate Division's decision, please use this link: Bailey v. [read post]
29 Sep 2015, 9:21 am
U.S. v. [read post]
24 Jan 2016, 5:25 am
The Court of Appeal has given permission to appeal to each of the three defendants against the decision of Warby J in the case of Lachaux v Independent Print ([2015] EWHC 2242 (QB)). [read post]
28 Sep 2022, 8:39 am
This is one of the greatest David v. [read post]
1 Aug 2008, 9:38 am
Secretary of State for the Home Department v British Union for the Abolition of Vivisection and another [2008] EWCA Civ 870; [2008] WLR (D) 273 “Information supplied by applicants for animal experimentation licences was exempt from disclosure under the Freedom of Information Act 2000 if the official in possession of the information knew or had reasonable grounds for believing that it was given in confidence, which was a subjective test requiring consideration of the… [read post]
23 Aug 2010, 1:47 am
Regina v Seaton [2010] EWCA Crim 1980; [2010] WLR (D) 234 “Where it was suggested at trial that a defendant’s or witness’s account was a recent fabrication, he could not, unless he had waived legal professional privilege, be asked whether he had told his lawyer what he now said was the truth, or whether he was willing to waive the privilege. [read post]
16 Aug 2012, 11:05 am
Supreme Court's Gross v. [read post]
29 May 2014, 5:00 am
We are discussing ATP Tour v. [read post]
6 Feb 2015, 7:57 am
This conclusion followed from accepting the evidence of Hospira's expert Dr Earhart given in Figure 1 (illustrated). [read post]
31 Jul 2007, 11:33 am
And I also agree that there's no express statute that requires a coroner, who was given the body of a drive-by shooting victim to autopsy, to refrigerate or embalm a corpse. [read post]
20 Jun 2011, 8:30 am
I have previously given my thoughts on it, as a defendant, and my defense of vade et caca in pilleum. [read post]
