Search for: "Herring v. Commissioner"
Results 1141 - 1160
of 3,267
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
7 Dec 2015, 1:00 am
UBS AG v Commissioners for Her Majesty’s Revenue and Customs, heard 3 December 2015. [read post]
7 Aug 2012, 7:32 pm
On August 7, 2012, hearings in the landmark Canadian misleading advertising case Commissioner of Competition v. [read post]
12 Dec 2022, 3:45 am
The following Supreme Court judgments remain outstanding: (As of 16/12/22) The Law Debenture Trust Corporation plc v Ukraine (Represented by the Minister of Finance of Ukraine acting upon the instructions of the Cabinet of Ministers of Ukraine) Nos. 2 and 3, heard 9-12 December 2019 East of England Ambulance Service NHS Trust v Flowers and Ors, heard 22 June 2021 Fearn and others v Board of Trustees of the Tate Gallery heard 7th December 2021 Stanford… [read post]
2 Sep 2008, 8:26 pm
In Kreifall v. [read post]
29 Jan 2016, 7:30 am
UBS AG v Commissioners for Her Majesty’s Revenue and Customs, heard 3 December 2015. [read post]
26 Jul 2016, 7:02 am
In Gallagher v. [read post]
26 Jul 2016, 7:02 am
In Gallagher v. [read post]
1 Mar 2010, 3:13 am
” ALJ Zorgniotti recommended that Meyers be given ten-day suspension without pay as the penalty for his action.In making her recommendation Zorgniotti noted that she had considered the material in Meyers “personnel abstract. [read post]
24 Feb 2009, 4:33 am
" ALJ Zorgniotti recommended that Meyers be given ten-day suspension without pay as the penalty for his action.In making her recommendation Zorgniotti noted that she had considered the material in Meyers "personnel abstract. [read post]
21 Mar 2021, 5:10 pm
She wrote: “Although it was not my intention, I accept that my statements were defamatory of Ms Sarkar and caused her very substantial distress. [read post]
18 Mar 2010, 12:27 am
Providing for the defense and indemnification of employees being sued as a result of the performance, or failure to perform, their official dutiesMatter of Matyas v Board of Educ., Chenango Forks Cent. [read post]
15 Oct 2023, 4:51 pm
Knox, along with her Italian ex- [read post]
6 Aug 2008, 5:16 pm
Specifically, Baniaga argues that (1) the search of her vehicle following her arrest violated Article I, section 11 of the Indiana Constitution; (2) the civil forfeiture of her vehicle and subsequent criminal prosecution for possession of cocaine violated the prohibition against double jeopardy; and (3) the evidence was insufficient to support her conviction for possession of cocaine. [read post]
7 Jul 2021, 9:01 pm
B.L., addressing whether a teen could be punished for speech on Snapchat, off school grounds and addressed to her own audience; and NCAA v. [read post]
26 Jul 2011, 3:18 am
Citing Hessney v Public Schools of Tarrytowns, 228 AD2d 954, the court pointed out that “the Commissioner of Education has the specialized knowledge and expertise to resolve the factual issue of whether [Donato's] former position and the new position are similar within the meaning of Education Law Section 3013(3)(a). [read post]
21 Jul 2010, 3:28 am
” Doherty allegedly responded that “he would 'have her job in the morning'“.Forty-eight hours later Cavanaugh was unemployed.Cavanaugh sued, claiming a breach of her employment contract; abusive discharge; violation of her civil rights and other wrongdoings by Doherty, James Flateau, her immediate supervisor and John Patterson, a Correctional Services’ deputy commissioner who allegedly ordered Flateau to fire Cavanaugh… [read post]
23 Apr 2014, 4:42 am
In Core v. [read post]
12 Mar 2014, 6:19 am
The traffic court commissioner subsequently found Spriggs guilty of violating section 23123(a) and ordered him to pay a $165 fine. [read post]
17 Nov 2020, 7:40 pm
As Professor Velte argues in her post (and as I have elaborated in Who’s the Bigot?) [read post]
9 Dec 2008, 12:13 pm
The government doesn't have to be perfectly consistent, but it must explain its decisions when making a significant change from precedent.EMMNYPPL comments: In Engel v Sobel, 161 AD2d 873, the Appellate Division indicated that while the Commissioner of Education could deviate from prior administrative precedent, such deviation must be adequately explained. [read post]
