Search for: "High v State"
Results 1141 - 1160
of 35,506
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
14 May 2014, 8:07 pm
According to the state high court, Bond was intentionally deceived as to the fairness of the criminal justice system itself because of the color of his skin. [read post]
26 Aug 2015, 7:38 am
But now, in Munn v. [read post]
18 Jul 2011, 7:47 am
Court of Appeal (Civil Division) Revenue and Customs v Jones & Anor [2011] EWCA Civ 824 (18 July 2011) Barclays Bank Plc v Nylon Capital LLP [2011] EWCA Civ 826 (18 July 2011) High Court (Chancery Division) Milsom & Ors v Ablyazov [2011] EWHC 1846 (Ch) (18 July 2011) High Court (Administrative Court) Secretary of State for the Home Department v BF [2011] EWHC 1878 (Admin) (18 July 2011) Source: www.bailii.org [read post]
4 Dec 2015, 5:27 am
Although the state is free to continue to use its VAM for diagnostic or other purposes, it cannot use it for high stakes purposes of terminating teachers or placing teachers... [read post]
24 Dec 2019, 4:29 am
An uncertain legal state of affairs would affect the economy of the nation, and therefore, it was important to settle the law swiftly and surely. [read post]
23 May 2012, 2:27 am
Court of Appeal (Civil Division) Hall v Harris & Ors [2012] EWCA Civ 671 (22 May 2012) Ryanair Holdings Plc v The Office of Fair Trading & Anor [2012] EWCA Civ 643 (22 May 2012) High Court (Queen’s Bench Division) Smeaton v Equifax Plc [2012] EWHC 2088 (QB) (11 May 2012) High Court (Chancery Division) Aerostar Maintenance International Ltd & Anor v Wilson & Ors [2012] EWHC 1353 (Ch) (04 May 2012) High Court… [read post]
13 Mar 2013, 9:22 pm
Antrim Truck Centre Ltd v Ontario (Minister Of Transportation)" (2011) 90 Can Bar Rev 215. [read post]
27 May 2014, 10:14 am
The decision in Plumhoff v. [read post]
2 Aug 2013, 5:19 am
R. v. [read post]
15 Sep 2008, 9:53 am
Court of Appeal (Civil Divison) Murungaru v Secretary of State for the Home Department & Ors [2008] EWCA Civ 1015 (12 September 2008) High Court (Administrative Court) Ross, R (on the application of) v West Sussex Primary Care Trust [2008] EWHC B15 (Admin) (temporary reference) (10 September 2008) H, R (on the application of) v Secretary of State for the Home Department [2008] EWHC 2174 (Admin) (12 September 2008) Source: www.bailii.org [read post]
4 Apr 2020, 11:23 am
” The decision is captioned Patrick Rossello v. [read post]
2 Nov 2021, 10:55 am
Although the challengers in New York State Rifle & Pistol Association v. [read post]
18 Nov 2015, 2:08 am
The High Court held that the Rule itself was not unlawful. [read post]
10 Feb 2010, 8:44 am
The Delhi High Court delivered a landmark judgment in the case of Manushi Sangathan v. [read post]
1 May 2008, 5:24 am
United States v. [read post]
25 Oct 2016, 4:04 pm
To come back to the IPT, it applies the rulings in the judgement by the European Court of Human Right in Weber & Saravia v Germany [2008] and Kennedy v United Kingdom [2011] to solve issues 2 and 3 (Mention is also made of R E v United Kingdom [2016] and Szabo & Vissy v Hungary). [read post]
23 Jan 2013, 1:45 pm
Exclusion from Refugee Convention (Free Movement, Jan. 2013) [text] - Comment on Al-Sirri v Secretary of State for the Home Department; DD (Afghanistan) v Secretary of State for the Home Department. [read post]
29 Jan 2021, 10:44 am
In a 4-3 opinion, the Arizona high court ruled in State v. [read post]
16 Nov 2011, 9:21 am
The ACLU opined that a district judge's April dismissal [JURIST report] of a lawsuit by six same-sex couples in Donaldson and Guggenheim v. [read post]
8 Jul 2008, 1:10 pm
United States v. [read post]
