Search for: "Holder v. United States"
Results 1141 - 1160
of 3,853
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
21 Aug 2022, 5:06 am
United States, 318 U.S. 236, 244 (1943). [read post]
8 Mar 2012, 3:00 am
H/T to Alison Frankel for the pointer to the oral arguments in Linde v. [read post]
26 Jan 2023, 6:35 pm
The idea of the illegality doctrine comes from Everet v. [read post]
24 Jun 2010, 3:27 pm
United States, 86 F3d 890, 894 (9th Cir. 1996)(citation omitted). [read post]
16 Nov 2009, 6:45 am
United States ex rel. [read post]
4 Nov 2013, 4:39 am
” On Friday the United States filed an amicus brief in Fisher v. [read post]
24 Sep 2017, 5:22 pm
This was the first such review of its kind in United States history. [read post]
9 Jun 2022, 12:21 pm
But the picture wouldn't be complete without a development over at the United States Appeals Court for the Federal Circuit that could--in a worst-case but far-from-impossible scenario--complicate matters for SEP holders in the only U.S. forum where they have a realistic shot at getting (the equivalent of) an injunction against implementers: the United States International Trade Commission (USITC, or just ITC).It's already so difficult to obtain… [read post]
8 Sep 2017, 1:10 pm
” That observation dovetails with the Court’s holding in United States v. [read post]
6 May 2013, 6:44 am
The Third District’s opinion in Aventura Management, LLC v. [read post]
27 Apr 2010, 2:20 am
SE C.V. v. [read post]
2 Dec 2009, 7:50 am
United States. [read post]
24 Jan 2012, 8:23 pm
The most prominent law-related comment: President Obama calling on Attorney General Eric Holder “to create a special unit of federal prosecutors and leading state attorneys general to expand our investigations into the abusive lending and packaging of risky mortgages that led to the housing crisis. [read post]
8 Jul 2021, 9:17 am
The companies argued that, when the highly educated and highly skilled spouses of the 580,000 H-1B and 75,000 L-1 visa holders cannot obtain work authorization, all of these individuals will ultimately decide to leave the United States and take their talents to other countries. [read post]
14 Jun 2022, 5:11 am
Gilstrap of the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Texas affirmed that decision last month. [read post]
14 Jun 2022, 6:32 am
Theoretically, Panel Opinion 2.0 could have a different outcome and--for instance--remand the case to the United States District Court for the Northern District of Texas with the instruction to allow Conti to amend its complaint again. [read post]
27 Jul 2007, 5:56 am
Garcia v. [read post]
15 Dec 2010, 9:39 pm
Just 5 years ago, the United States Supreme Court upheld a taking of property for purely economic reasons. [read post]
7 Jun 2013, 11:37 am
Perry, the challenge to California’s Proposition 8, and United States v. [read post]
4 Feb 2022, 4:42 pm
Roy v. [read post]
