Search for: "Holiday v. State" Results 1141 - 1160 of 2,357
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
15 May 2015, 5:00 am
” – was the issue facing the United States District Court for the District of New Jersey in Brady v. [read post]
1 Jun 2013, 6:49 pm by APransky
Children's participation with parents in religious holidays should be detailed. [read post]
21 Nov 2008, 10:45 am
Boron, of Salem, Ohio, wrote that state-recognized holidays could be read to include such obscure events as Hubert J. [read post]
17 Jun 2008, 1:20 am
Scope of arbitration Richfield Springs CSD v Allen, App. [read post]
23 Jan 2019, 12:10 pm by Matthew Davie
These are Department for Education v Information Commissioner & Whitmey [2018] UKUT 348 and Cabinet Office v Information Commissioner & Webber [2018] UKUT 410. [read post]
11 Nov 2013, 12:02 am by Laura Sandwell
R (HS2 Action Alliance Ltd) v The Secretary of State for Transport & Anor, R (Heathrow Hub Limited & Anor) v The Secretary of State for Transport & Anor, and R (Buckinghamshire County Council & Ors) v The Secretary of State for Transport, heard 15 – 16 October 2013. [read post]
20 Nov 2012, 12:34 am
Approach to be taken in cases of conflict between the assessments of local authority and The Sec. of State for the Home Department. [read post]
1 Sep 2014, 7:04 am
Takeda had sought an application stating that Mylan was infringing its patented acid-reflux drug Dexilant [read post]
16 Aug 2009, 3:05 am
The court held that the advance notice rule to apply for special holiday observances was permissible and that that there was no discriminatory intent involved in rejecting plaintiff's application as late.In Willard v. [read post]
26 Dec 2023, 9:02 pm by Marci A. Hamilton
United States and then again in the 1990 decision, Employment Div. v. [read post]
10 Sep 2020, 4:34 pm by David Cross and Norah Chafardet
The Guidance follows the recent Full Federal Court (Court) decision in WorkPac Pty Ltd v Rossato [2020] FCAFC 84 (Rossato),[2] which held that a person cannot be a casual employee where there is a firm advance commitment to on-going work. [read post]