Search for: "IN RE GRANT"
Results 1141 - 1160
of 37,587
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
23 Jan 2024, 3:43 am
If the Court grants review, this case offers an opportunity to resolve both new and longstanding divergence in Federal Circuit obviousness decisions. [read post]
23 Jan 2024, 1:40 am
But High Voltage Tattoo is now defunct, so they’re likely a waste of time. [read post]
23 Jan 2024, 1:29 am
Contact Our Downers Grove Family Law Attorneys If you’re navigating the complexities of the recent changes in family law, including the interim attorney fees provision, don’t hesitate to seek professional guidance. [read post]
22 Jan 2024, 9:01 pm
Ralston Purina Co.[4] Imagine that — the Commission engaging in notice-and-comment rulemaking, including a re-proposal, to address regulatory uncertainty and ambiguity following judicial decisions. [read post]
22 Jan 2024, 1:36 pm
When something enters the public domain, you’re free to copy, share, and remix it without fear of a copyright lawsuit. [read post]
22 Jan 2024, 1:16 pm
The Fate of Patent Term Adjustment: In re Cellect Seeks Rehearing on Double Patenting Parties Cellect, LLC: Paul J. [read post]
22 Jan 2024, 7:10 am
We’re ready to start fighting for you today. [read post]
22 Jan 2024, 5:05 am
“As long as we’re able to find a pathway to a solution, a resolution, a pathway that means that we’re not going to be here again in a year or two, then we can talk about anything,” Prince Faisal said. [read post]
22 Jan 2024, 4:30 am
I explained that an express grant of such policy discretion allows just as much inter-administration switching, but that unless the Court were to insist on a very strict version of the heretofore almost toothless nondelegation doctrine, express grants of discretion are permissible. [read post]
N.D. Cal. Judge Pushes Back on Copyright SAD Scheme Cases–Viral DRM v. YouTube Schedule A Defendants
21 Jan 2024, 8:13 am
If the court had done so, the court would not have granted the ex parte TRO against most/all of the defendants. [read post]
21 Jan 2024, 12:05 am
The general rule enunciated by the Court of Arches in Re Blagdon Cemetery [2002] Fam 299 is that because of the theological principle that Christian burial is final, a faculty for exhumation will only be granted in exceptional circumstances [5]. [read post]
20 Jan 2024, 1:23 pm
After they identify defendant, the officer shows them a picture of defendant to make sure they’re talking about the same person. [read post]
20 Jan 2024, 8:15 am
"Expansion without mandates: Border and asylum agencies in European Union migration governance," Governance, Early View, 12 Jan. 2024 [open access]"'Living, that’s what we do': an ethnographic account of time and leisure in the British asylum system," Leisure Studies, Latest Articles, 12 Jan. 2024 [open access]"Narratives of Symbolic Objects: Exploring Relational Wellbeing of Young Refugees Living in Scotland, Finland, and Norway," Social… [read post]
20 Jan 2024, 4:00 am
The judge can be asked by the prosecutor to grant a waiver, which would permit the offender to avoid imprisonment or receive a shorter sentence. [read post]
19 Jan 2024, 9:46 am
Note that some states permit the use of fictitious names by physicians but from what I can figure out, the physicians need approval and it’s granted when a physician wants to omit a middle name, use their original name after changing their legal name due to marriage, or shortening their name if it is long and difficult to pronounce. [read post]
19 Jan 2024, 6:27 am
If you’re unclear about when or how to schedule an inspection, contact your local DMV to confirm your responsibilities. [read post]
19 Jan 2024, 2:07 am
Re St. [read post]
18 Jan 2024, 9:06 pm
We’re thrilled that consumers in Israel will soon be able, like those in the U.S. and Singapore, to purchase these delicious products. [read post]
18 Jan 2024, 9:01 pm
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit ruled that officials in Grants Pass, Oregon cannot enforce anti-camping ordinances if there are no other places for homeless individuals to go. [read post]
18 Jan 2024, 5:14 pm
” The last case cited (In re Starrett) is interesting not just because of its specific subject matter, but also because it does not pertain to life sciences technology (although according to the Federal Circuit decision it did claim to pertain to “a gadget-free extension of human senses”). [read post]
