Search for: "In re Marks" Results 1141 - 1160 of 30,056
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
19 Sep 2014, 3:58 am
[Answer in first comment].In re Special Fruit NV, Serial No. 79112203 (September 17, 2014) [not precedential]. [read post]
22 Feb 2021, 3:03 pm by Johanna Alonso
But although they’re not his clientele, he is passionate about supporting small businesses — so much so that for the past 11 years, he’s done it for free, conducting free trainings and hosting meet-ups for small business owners. [read post]
15 Aug 2008, 11:00 am
The Board granted Respondent's motion for judgment on the ground of res judicata, ruling that HBP's claim was barred because of its earlier failed opposition to the same mark. [read post]
8 Jul 2016, 4:27 am
That the McDONALD'S mark predated the MACCOFFEE mark; 2. [read post]
6 Dec 2006, 5:11 pm
" In re 1175856 Ontario Ltd., Serial No. 78442207 (October 26, 2006).The Board therefore reversed the mutilation refusal.Text Copyright John L. [read post]
So while you’re fighting that battle, you file just the word portion of your figurative mark and get a registration. [read post]
15 Nov 2006, 6:10 pm
In re Taddeo, Serial No. 76508763 (October 19, 2006) [not citable].Starting with the second du Pont factor, the similarity of the goods, the Board found Applicant's tequila to be related to the beer of the first registration, and to be encompassed within the "distilled spirits" of the second registration. [read post]
17 Mar 2011, 3:02 pm by Lynne Butler
You congratulate her, mark the date on your calendar, and... research your legal rights? [read post]
8 Mar 2020, 4:25 am
Jane Lambert Appointed Person (Mr Martin Howe QC) Re Registered Design No 6045074, Lambretta Club Great Britain v Frankland BL 0-129-20 6 March 2020 This was an appeal to the Appointed Person by Mr Gavin Frankland against the decision of Mr Oliver Morris on behalf of the Comptroller-General of Patents, Designs and Trade Marks in Re Registered Design No 6045074, Lambretta Club Great [read post]
6 Mar 2017, 3:34 am
In re Republic National LLC, Serial No. 86513101 (February 23, 2017) [not precedential].The Board pointed out that a specimen of use must show "some direct association between the offer of services and the mark sought to be registered therefor. [read post]
22 Sep 2010, 1:28 pm by Don Cruse
If you’re just looking at the judgment (“reverse or affirm? [read post]
30 Sep 2022, 3:49 am
In re Moxie Inc., Serial No. 90100833 (September 28, 2022) [not precedential] (Opinion by Judge Cheryl S. [read post]
14 Sep 2010, 2:30 am by John L. Welch
It then came down to the marks: is Applicant's mark FIRESIDE GLOW ["FIRESIDE" disclaimed] likely to cause confusion with the registered mark FIRESIDE WARMTH? [read post]