Search for: "J"
Results 1141 - 1160
of 110,626
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
11 Sep 2024, 7:54 am
If the principal J-1 holder is subject to the requirement, their J-2 dependents are as well. [read post]
10 Jan 2021, 1:14 pm
Vincent J. [read post]
8 Jul 2022, 2:57 pm
Mandelbrot; Michael J. [read post]
21 Sep 2018, 8:50 am
Another announcement from our friends at Petrie-Flom Each year the Edmond J. [read post]
11 Aug 2023, 11:50 am
This makes his case different from most of the other pending cases against J&J. [read post]
13 Mar 2013, 7:57 am
A Local Official's Guide to Language Access Laws by David J. [read post]
22 Feb 2011, 6:16 pm
He's certainly gray enough (in the fur and flesh, perhaps a bit lighter than he looks in this photo), and arguably also un-fierce enough, albeit not active or frenzied enough (he's generally quite serene).The next step was to dub him Rocket J. [read post]
19 May 2009, 2:37 pm
Robert J. [read post]
29 Apr 2010, 5:27 pm
His name is Brian J. [read post]
6 Nov 2019, 2:52 am
His J-1 visa page clearly states that he is not subject to the requirement; though his wife’s J-2 visa page states that she is subject to the requirement. [read post]
7 Nov 2022, 7:19 am
, 44 Harvard J. of Law & Pub. [read post]
30 Apr 2014, 4:37 pm
According to the Wall Street Journal, J&J purchased FemRx and its “Diva” morcellator in 1998. [read post]
16 Jan 2020, 1:00 am
Ann Selzer, Tweet about Iowa Poll Timing, Twitter, 1/2/2020 J. [read post]
30 Mar 2013, 9:00 am
The J&J executive said that the devices weren't meeting the clinical expectations of the company. [read post]
25 Feb 2013, 5:01 pm
Moreover, it seems that it was not just an isolated mistake which happened, as is shown by cases J 4/12 and J 23/10 which have the same underlying facts. [7] If the appellant’s argument were accepted this would mean giving a “carte blanche” to applicants who administer a large amount of patent applications and who apply generally accepted systems. [read post]
12 Jan 2022, 7:15 am
Chris is among them,” said Senior Partner Salvatore J. [read post]
13 Jun 2024, 9:26 am
Richard J. [read post]
21 Aug 2012, 5:01 pm
Under the principles laid down in the decisions T 14/89 and J 13/90, there is a legitimate expectation on the part of the applicant that the EPO should draw to the applicant’s attention deficiencies in a request for re-establishment of rights which are obviously easy to correct. [read post]
12 Oct 2011, 5:01 pm
J 10/01 [15-20], J 24/03 [4], J 18/04 [2.1], J 7/05 [3] and G 1/09 [3.2.4]. [read post]
31 Oct 2008, 4:04 am
Oct. 8, 2008), is an interesting decision where the court affirms the issuance of a 10(j) injunction. 10(j) injunctions are issued against employers pending resolution of unfair labor practice charges. [read post]
