Search for: "Jack Goldsmith"
Results 1141 - 1160
of 1,693
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
15 Apr 2013, 7:15 pm
The first and second are a bit snarky, and make specific reference to my colleague and co-panelist Jack Goldsmith, so I want to make it clear at the outset that my remarks are NOT directed at him personally; I’m using “him” as an allusion to a more general phenomenon.1. [read post]
15 Apr 2013, 7:14 pm
Both Jack Goldsmith and I had noted that we don’t really know the extent to which reported general political affiliations translate into bias in the classroom, but put that aside. [read post]
15 Apr 2013, 7:08 am
Schiff wanted to draft legislation creating a court to oversee such strikes, he consulted with one of the founders of Lawfare, Jack Goldsmith. [read post]
9 Apr 2013, 7:40 am
Ivana Radačić; Looking Back at EJIL 2012 – The Stats; Changes in the Masthead – Our Scientific Advisory Board; In this Issue Symposium: Just and Unjust Warriors: Marking the 35th Anniversary of Walzer’s Just and Unjust Wars Gabriella Blum & JHH Weiler, Preface Robert Howse, Thucydides and Just War: How to Begin to Read Walzer’s Just and Unjust Wars JHH Weiler & Abby Deshman, Far be it from Thee to Slay the Righteous with the Wicked: An Historical and… [read post]
25 Mar 2013, 6:01 am
“Perhaps the complaint is that the Chinese are doing better against our government networks than we are against theirs,” law professor Jack Goldsmith wrote. [read post]
24 Mar 2013, 7:47 pm
But after I (together with Paul Clement) and Jack Goldsmith submitted amicus briefs in the first briefing round arguing that the real issue is whether the ATS applies at all to torts allegedly committed in other countries, the Supreme Court ordered the case rebriefed and reargued on the issue of extraterritoriality. [read post]
21 Mar 2013, 6:43 pm
Leiter explicitly commended the Chesney-Goldsmith-Waxman-Wittes report as a good theoretical model for thinking about how the AUMF should be changed. [read post]
18 Mar 2013, 9:28 pm
It’s quickly becoming apparent that we and Jack appear to be talking past each other on the merits of the Chesney/Goldsmith/Waxman/Wittes (CGWW) proposal for a new framework statute for “extra-AUMF threats. [read post]
17 Mar 2013, 7:31 pm
And yet, such an expansion lies at the heart of a proposal put forth in a Hoover Institution working paper released in February and co-authored by our friends Bobby Chesney, Jack Goldsmith, Matt Waxman, and Ben Wittes. [read post]
12 Mar 2013, 10:13 am
The following guest post is the latest in a series comprising a debate as to whether LOAC requires an attempt to capture rather than a first-resort to lethal force in some circumstances. [read post]
26 Feb 2013, 11:13 am
As Jack Goldsmith noted last week, an Op-Ed I wrote in Slate is based on—and referred interested readers to—my forthcoming EJIL article for the complete argument. [read post]
26 Feb 2013, 6:29 am
Jack Goldsmith has flagged NYU professor Ryan Goodman’s European Journal of International Law article, “The Power to Kill or Capture Enemy Combatants,” as well as a Slate article by Goodman drawn from that academic journal piece, “The Lesser Evil: What the Obama administration isn’t telling you about drones: the standard rule is capture, not kill. [read post]
24 Feb 2013, 2:36 pm
The most thoughtful and influential defenses of the status quo—by Alexander Bickel, Jack Goldsmith, and Geoffrey Stone—are self-consciously ambivalent. [read post]
10 Feb 2013, 7:41 pm
Regular readers of Lawfare will be well aware of this, as it’s something that has been predicted by many contributors to this blog – John Bellinger, Jack Goldsmith, Ben Wittes, Bobby Chesney, myself and many others writing here. [read post]
6 Feb 2013, 7:51 am
Jack Goldsmith at Lawfare has thoughts. [read post]
5 Feb 2013, 8:13 pm
” The precise legal analysis is a distraction from more compelling issues, which are taken up by Jack Goldsmith in a Washington Post op-ed. [read post]
31 Jan 2013, 12:57 pm
Art Carney over Jack Nicholson, Al Pacino, and Dustin Hoffman?!!!). [read post]
14 Jan 2013, 2:29 pm
John Brennan, nominated by President Obama to become the next CIA director, will apparently face some tough questioning from Senator Ron Wyden (D-OR) at his Senate confirmation hearings (reportedly set for Thursday, February 7, 2:30 pm). [read post]
