Search for: "John A Rogers"
Results 1141 - 1160
of 3,049
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
23 Feb 2016, 4:31 pm
The dissents of Justices John McLean and Benjamin Curtis showed how the majority opinion of Chief Justice Roger Taney ignored the Court’s own precedents and disregarded specific grants of power in the constitution. [read post]
23 Feb 2016, 5:17 am
USAA spokesman Roger Wildermuth said it disagrees with the ruling and is appealing to the Montana Supreme Court. [read post]
22 Feb 2016, 7:18 am
Judging by the tone of the questions posed by Chief Justice John Roberts as well as Justices Samuel Alito and Scalia, the three seemed to be aligned in their belief that standing should be limited to those who can show an actual concrete injury rather than those who can allege a mere statutory violation, as the four liberal justices seemed to hold. [read post]
21 Feb 2016, 9:06 pm
Michael Rogers, and DIA Director Lt. [read post]
21 Feb 2016, 6:51 am
Brandeis, Roger K. [read post]
17 Feb 2016, 7:44 am
I understand Huebner would also exclude the vacancy created by Oliver Ellsworth in 1800 and filled by John Marshall in January 1801. [read post]
17 Feb 2016, 3:24 am
Rogers provided the following information:The Trademark Trial and Appeal Board currently has 23 Administrative Judges (plus the Chief Judge and the Deputy Chief Judge) and 13.5 interlocutory attorneys. [read post]
15 Feb 2016, 2:28 pm
Steve Klepper at the Maryland Appellate Blog suggests a plan for Chief Justice John Roberts to preserve the Court’s institutional integrity in the year ahead. [read post]
15 Feb 2016, 5:51 am
At his eponymous blog, John Q. [read post]
14 Feb 2016, 3:21 pm
Initial reactions, which include some very fine appreciations: Cass Sunstein, Mark Stern, John McGinnis, Ross Douthat, Jacob Sullum, Ilya Shapiro, and, at Cato’s blog, Roger Pilon, Trevor Burrus, Ilya Shapiro again, and Tim Lynch. [read post]
14 Feb 2016, 10:18 am
Douglas, as controversial as Roger Taney. [read post]
12 Feb 2016, 11:53 am
Testifying before the Senate Armed Services Committee with DIA Director Vincent Stewart, and then later in front of the Senate Select Committee on Intelligence with CIA Director John Brennan, FBI Director James Comey, NSA Director Michael Rogers, and DIA Director Vincent Stewart, Clapper outlined the top global threats the United States faces today. [read post]
11 Feb 2016, 9:05 pm
Why that’s important [Roger Pilon] 2013 Kiobel v. [read post]
10 Feb 2016, 3:47 pm
"There is no Fourth Amendment violation, because Houston had no reasonable expectation of privacy in video footage recorded by a camera that was located on top of a public utility pole and that captured the same views enjoyed by passersby on public roads," Judge John Rogers wrote for the unanimous court, which ruled 3-0 to uphold Houston's 2014 conviction. [read post]
9 Feb 2016, 11:33 am
At 2:30 pm, DNI James Clapper, CIA Director John Brennan, FBI Director James Comey, NSA Director Michael Rogers, and DIA Director Lt. [read post]
9 Feb 2016, 7:29 am
Later in the day at 2:30 pm, DNI Clapper, CIA Director John Brennan, FBI Director James Comey, NSA Director Michael Rogers, and DIA Director Lt. [read post]
9 Feb 2016, 2:04 am
The link goes to my son John's Facebook page, where he says: "When I was a kid, I always loved to go there with my dad, Richard L Cohen. [read post]
8 Feb 2016, 1:15 pm
Here’s the holding from the majority opinion by Judge John Rogers that was joined by Judge Bernice Donald: There is no Fourth Amendment violation, because Houston had no reasonable expectation of privacy in video footage recorded by a camera that was located on top of a public utility pole and that captured the same views enjoyed by passersby on public roads. [read post]
3 Feb 2016, 10:35 am
We might see the impact of constitutional political economy in efforts to rebalance the political power of news forms of worker association and grassroots social movements (as suggested by Kate Andrias and Brishen Rogers). [read post]
29 Jan 2016, 6:20 am
Judge Janice Rogers Brown said just because one of the purposes of campaign reform laws was broader disclosure “doesn’t mean that anything less than maximal disclosure is subversive,” the judge said. [read post]
