Search for: "Johnson v. State of California"
Results 1141 - 1160
of 1,507
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
14 Mar 2016, 2:56 am
Utilizing a different rationale, the court in Avon State Bank v. [read post]
28 Jun 2007, 10:16 am
You can now state openly what you though all along - that it's safe and effective to cure Alzheimers. [read post]
31 Dec 2008, 12:26 am
See United States v. [read post]
1 Nov 2010, 2:46 am
XX v HMRC (IP finance) United States US Patents ‘Sub-standard’ patents cost the US economy over $25 billion a year. [read post]
3 Jul 2015, 5:54 am
” In a post at the Ninth Circuit Blog, Steve Sady contends that the Court’s recent decision in Johnson v. [read post]
12 Dec 2011, 11:15 am
California v. [read post]
12 Jan 2022, 12:35 pm
” Challengers argue that the law is impermissibly extraterritorial because virtually all the pork consumed in California is raised outside the state. [read post]
3 Dec 2015, 12:25 pm
Franklin California Tax-Free Trust, 15-233, and Acosta-Febo v. [read post]
4 Feb 2010, 7:35 am
” More significant was his draft opinion in Regents of the University of California v. [read post]
9 Dec 2013, 11:12 am
Johnson, 491 U.S. 397, 414 (1989); Cohen v. [read post]
22 Nov 2010, 11:02 am
United StatesDocket: 10-18Issue(s): Whether, when a trial judge’s restriction on the cross-examination of a prosecution witness is challenged on appeal as a violation of the Confrontation Clause, the proper standard of review is de novo or abuse of discretion.Certiorari-Stage Documents:Opinion below (Court of Appeals for the Armed Forces)Petition for certiorariBrief in oppositionAmicus brief of the United States Army Defense Appellate DivisionAmicus brief of the National Association… [read post]
20 Aug 2019, 7:31 pm
Johnson. [read post]
17 Sep 2014, 7:00 am
We foresee no obstacle to a State’s dealing effectively with this problem. [read post]
23 May 2012, 4:00 pm
Johnson, 11-1053, a state-on-top habeas case out of the Third Circuit; Parker, Warden v. [read post]
4 Mar 2020, 2:18 pm
That case, Stoyas v. [read post]
9 Jan 2017, 11:37 pm
Johnson, 302 S.W.3d 483, 492 (Tex. [read post]
11 Jan 2017, 7:19 am
California Public Employees’ Retirement System v. [read post]
3 Mar 2023, 7:32 am
See, e.g., Johnson v. [read post]
16 May 2019, 7:55 am
United States, 18-7096. [read post]
21 Jul 2008, 9:14 pm
Haviland, No. 07-3380 Grant of a conditional writ of habeas corpus is affirmed where: 1) petitioner sought to represent himself at trial, and the trial court's failure to rule on his requests to proceed pro se deprived him of his Sixth Amendment right to self-representation; and 2) state courts' objectiv [read post]
