Search for: "Johnson v. State of California"
Results 1141 - 1160
of 1,508
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
2 Jun 2011, 12:46 pm
Robins Co., 738 P.2d 1210, 1227-28 (Kan. 1987) (applied to medical device); Johnson v. [read post]
29 May 2011, 9:30 am
Kowalski began the 1948 Spring Training season with Pueblo, but before the regular season began he was demoted to the Class B Asheville Tourists of the Tri-State League. [read post]
27 May 2011, 4:20 pm
Hill v. [read post]
26 May 2011, 6:00 am
[This is the third installment in a three-part series on the Guest-Post: States’ Rights, Big Business and the Nature of Arbitration: AT&T Mobility LLC v. [read post]
24 May 2011, 11:16 am
Johnson, whose ImmigrationProf blog post on this issue is here) [read post]
23 May 2011, 3:33 pm
By: Betsy Johnson California employers have been waiting since October 2008 for the California Supreme Court to issue it decisions in Brinker Restaurant v. [read post]
20 May 2011, 9:02 am
” The Concepcion opinion, authored by Justice Scalia, seemingly ignored federalism precedent by finding that California’s Discover Bank Rule, Discover Bank v. [read post]
18 May 2011, 8:53 pm
Henry “Hank” Johnson (D-GA) and Sen. [read post]
17 May 2011, 6:38 pm
Title: Johnson v. [read post]
15 May 2011, 8:05 am
LEXIS 50028 (ED CA, May 9, 2011), a California federal magistrate judge recommended denying an inmate's claim in a habeas corpus proceeding that he was required by state officials to participate in a faith-based AA/NA program as a condition of parole. [read post]
12 May 2011, 10:17 pm
A federal trial court, upheld by the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit, struck down the AT&T arbitration clause as unconscionable under California law and allowed the plaintiffs to move forward against the company in a class action in federal court. [read post]
12 May 2011, 1:58 pm
The issue is currently before the California Supreme Court in Brinker Restaurant v. [read post]
12 May 2011, 12:58 pm
The issue is currently before the California Supreme Court in Brinker Restaurant v. [read post]
7 May 2011, 1:25 pm
Did DePuy Orthopaedics, subsidiary of New Jersey-based Johnson & Johnson, knowingly sell defective hip implant devices? [read post]
5 May 2011, 5:23 pm
Keating, the Supreme Court held the FAA applies to state courts and is intended to preempt state anti-arbitration laws to the contrary, and in Circuit City Stores, Inc., v. [read post]
4 May 2011, 4:30 am
Johnson v. [read post]
29 Apr 2011, 4:28 am
AT&T Mobility LLC v. [read post]
28 Apr 2011, 3:18 pm
[but] in a general sense, the principles of comment k relate to the negligence concepts.Toner, 732 P.2d at 310-11 (various citations omitted).Toner relied heavily on then-California law, as decided by intermediate California courts, especially Kearl v. [read post]
25 Apr 2011, 3:07 pm
Johnson v. [read post]
21 Apr 2011, 7:56 pm
On April 1, 2011, in United States v. [read post]
