Search for: "Johnson v. United States Government" Results 1141 - 1160 of 2,043
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
27 Mar 2015, 9:55 am by John Elwood
  The state asks (1) whether the Michigan courts’ decision not to extend United States v. [read post]
26 Mar 2015, 7:55 am by Richard Booth
To set the stage, Omnicare is the largest provider of pharmacy-related services for the elderly and other residents of long-term care facilities in the United States. [read post]
19 Mar 2015, 8:05 am by Maureen Johnston
Donald 14-618Issue: (1) Whether the Michigan courts' decision not to extend United States v. [read post]
13 Mar 2015, 10:47 am by John Elwood
United States (seven). [read post]
5 Mar 2015, 6:07 pm
Citizen suits expand the resources available to protect the environment and the notice requirements give the government the first opportunity to act. [read post]
5 Mar 2015, 2:56 pm by John Elwood
Johnson, 13-10288 (third relist). [read post]
5 Mar 2015, 6:00 am by Maureen Johnston
Donald 14-618Issue: (1) Whether the Michigan courts' decision not to extend United States v. [read post]
27 Feb 2015, 6:15 am by John Elwood
Johnson, 13-10288 (second relist). [read post]
27 Feb 2015, 3:22 am by Amy Howe
At Cato at Liberty, Trevor Burrus discusses the amicus brief that Cato filed in Johnson v. [read post]
26 Feb 2015, 9:19 am by Maureen Johnston
United States, or (b) “preventing further [government] disclosure,” United States v. [read post]
25 Feb 2015, 11:46 am by Marty Lederman
  As I wrote herein November:[I]t is not a violation of federal law for an undocumented alien to remain in the United States. [read post]
18 Feb 2015, 1:30 pm by Maureen Johnston
United States 14-456Issue: Whether, when a court of appeals issues a general remand for resentencing, the district court may conduct resentencing de novo. [read post]
18 Feb 2015, 1:28 pm
Tony Henderson was a United States Border Patrol Agent, charged with distributing marijuana. [read post]
18 Feb 2015, 8:00 am by Peter Margulies
  Under the government’s theory, the court warned, there was no limiting principle governing the award of such benefits, which conceivably could extend to the United States’ entire undocumented population. [read post]