Search for: "KERR v. STATE"
Results 1141 - 1160
of 1,528
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
29 Jan 2023, 10:42 pm
United States and Riley v. [read post]
7 Oct 2011, 8:47 am
The guiding principle in Scots law is Lawrie v Muir 1950 JC 19, which states that an irregularity in the method by which evidence has been obtained does not necessarily make that evidence inadmissible in a criminal prosecution [17]. [read post]
21 Mar 2012, 10:15 am
Supreme Court's ruling Tuesday in the Martinez v. [read post]
15 Jul 2018, 4:05 pm
Jeremy Wright MP has been appointed as Secretary of State for Digital, Culture, Media and Sport following Matt Hancock’s appointment as Health Secretary. [read post]
27 Jun 2016, 1:47 am
The panel will be Lord Neuberger, Lady Hale, Lord Mance, Lord Kerr, Lord Clarke. [read post]
20 Oct 2017, 6:12 am
Hudson, State v. [read post]
15 Aug 2008, 11:31 pm
"If for some weird reason the immunity provision doesn't carry the day for the government, I'm not sure DOJ could then try to raise the state secrets argument again a second time," Kerr said. [read post]
24 Jan 2012, 5:56 pm
Earlier this week, the United States Supreme Court answered with a unanimous "yes" in United States v Jones, 565 U. [read post]
8 Feb 2023, 7:36 am
On the same day, Chamberlain J heard an application in the case of VLM v LPB. [read post]
30 May 2018, 3:13 pm
From yesterday's Delaware Supreme Court decision in Everett v. [read post]
1 Dec 2015, 7:16 pm
The first question can be traced to some sloppy “law of the case” dictum in United States v. [read post]
17 Apr 2018, 11:29 am
State Farm Fire & Cas. [read post]
7 Sep 2010, 7:03 am
At Law.com, Tony Mauro and Carrie Levine report that the video game industry has been soliciting the support of state attorneys general in Schwarzenegger v. [read post]
22 May 2007, 3:42 pm
Frye that offers new insight on U.S. v. [read post]
18 Jun 2007, 1:50 pm
At Reuters, James Vicini has this article on the decision, "a defeat for California officials"; David Stout reports here in the New York Times; McClatchy's Michael Doyle has this story discussing the ruling, which affirms passengers' constitutional rights to search-and-seizure protections; at Volokh Conspiracy, Orin Kerr weighs in here on the Brendlin decision, stating "Justice Souter's opinion gets it right". [read post]
11 May 2011, 10:17 am
In an op-ed for the Los Angeles Times, Erwin Chemerinsky argues that the Court’s decision in AT&T Mobility v. [read post]
25 Apr 2019, 4:23 am
Taylor v. [read post]
23 Feb 2016, 4:10 am
The case, Utah v. [read post]
14 Nov 2016, 1:00 am
The panel will be Lord Neuberger, Lord Kerr and Lord Reed. [read post]
14 Feb 2015, 5:03 am
In a post at Slate, my buddy Cristian Farias writes about Chief Justice John Roberts’ cute quip during oral argument in Rodriquez v. [read post]
