Search for: "Kerr v. State"
Results 1141 - 1160
of 1,523
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
15 Jul 2018, 4:05 pm
Jeremy Wright MP has been appointed as Secretary of State for Digital, Culture, Media and Sport following Matt Hancock’s appointment as Health Secretary. [read post]
30 May 2018, 3:13 pm
From yesterday's Delaware Supreme Court decision in Everett v. [read post]
17 Apr 2018, 11:29 am
State Farm Fire & Cas. [read post]
1 Dec 2015, 7:16 pm
The first question can be traced to some sloppy “law of the case” dictum in United States v. [read post]
8 Feb 2023, 7:36 am
On the same day, Chamberlain J heard an application in the case of VLM v LPB. [read post]
15 Aug 2008, 11:31 pm
"If for some weird reason the immunity provision doesn't carry the day for the government, I'm not sure DOJ could then try to raise the state secrets argument again a second time," Kerr said. [read post]
20 Oct 2017, 6:12 am
Hudson, State v. [read post]
27 Jun 2016, 1:47 am
The panel will be Lord Neuberger, Lady Hale, Lord Mance, Lord Kerr, Lord Clarke. [read post]
24 Jan 2012, 5:56 pm
Earlier this week, the United States Supreme Court answered with a unanimous "yes" in United States v Jones, 565 U. [read post]
23 Feb 2016, 4:10 am
The case, Utah v. [read post]
22 May 2007, 3:42 pm
Frye that offers new insight on U.S. v. [read post]
7 Sep 2010, 7:03 am
At Law.com, Tony Mauro and Carrie Levine report that the video game industry has been soliciting the support of state attorneys general in Schwarzenegger v. [read post]
18 Jun 2007, 1:50 pm
At Reuters, James Vicini has this article on the decision, "a defeat for California officials"; David Stout reports here in the New York Times; McClatchy's Michael Doyle has this story discussing the ruling, which affirms passengers' constitutional rights to search-and-seizure protections; at Volokh Conspiracy, Orin Kerr weighs in here on the Brendlin decision, stating "Justice Souter's opinion gets it right". [read post]
11 May 2011, 10:17 am
In an op-ed for the Los Angeles Times, Erwin Chemerinsky argues that the Court’s decision in AT&T Mobility v. [read post]
25 Apr 2019, 4:23 am
Taylor v. [read post]
14 Feb 2015, 5:03 am
In a post at Slate, my buddy Cristian Farias writes about Chief Justice John Roberts’ cute quip during oral argument in Rodriquez v. [read post]
27 Dec 2011, 3:33 am
Otherwise, chances are pretty good that they will believe that you ruined their chances of "justice" by failing to raise that winner point, the one you left on the table.But try to cover them all and you can anticipate some snarky judge to write what Third Circuit Judge Aldisert did in United States v. [read post]
2 Oct 2014, 5:55 am
Remember how cool it was when the Third Circuit ruled in United States v. [read post]
14 Nov 2016, 1:00 am
The panel will be Lord Neuberger, Lord Kerr and Lord Reed. [read post]
21 Jun 2012, 7:40 am
Kerr-McGee Chemical Corp., 37 F.3d 96, 101 (3d Cir. 1994); City of Philadelphia v. [read post]
