Search for: "Larry Ribstein" Results 1141 - 1160 of 1,213
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
6 Dec 2011, 12:56 pm by Steve Bainbridge
Update: Larry Ribstein has a thoughtful post on the implications for legal education if one is willing to assume, arguendo, that Franke's basic critique holds water. [read post]
1 Aug 2009, 7:44 pm
Larry Ribstein feels the same way. [read post]
30 Jul 2009, 6:53 am
 UPDATE:   Larry Ribstein weighs in here; he notes that I've neglected to mention the, uh, Contracts Clause, which is indeed in the Constitution (but not an incredibly toothy provision). [read post]
25 May 2007, 6:13 am
  I subscribed to daily tutorials of corporate law wisdom generously broadcast to the world by Professors Stephen Bainbridge, Larry Ribstein, Gordon Smith, Victor Fleischer & Christine Hurt. [read post]
2 Mar 2010, 7:38 pm by Josh Wright
Larry Ribstein chimes in to make the well taken starting point that theory itself is not useful without data. [read post]
9 Aug 2011, 5:35 am
Among other things, it calls for more comparative research into alternative business entities dubbed “uncorporations” by Larry Ribstein and into corporate governance in increasingly important economies such as China and India.Interestingly, the paper focuses on the need for greater research on China and India as part of the comparative corporate governance movement. [read post]
6 Jun 2013, 4:23 am by Jeff Lipshaw
 The first, in October at the University of Illinois, is dedicated to the work of the late great Larry Ribstein, and the second is at the AALS meeting in January marking the thirtieth anniversary of Ron Gilson's influential article on value creation by lawyers. [read post]
26 Oct 2006, 8:31 am
Now, I assumed that my pedestrian comments were the embarrassment of the conference, and I cannot say that I would have expected otherwise, given that scholars of high repute such as Larry Ribstein appear to have little use for litigation as a corporate governance strategy. [read post]
20 Oct 2011, 9:34 pm by Josh Wright
Douglas Baird: Law and economics will return to its Chicago-born empirical roots, though the return is complicated by the reduced cost of empirical tools and access to data which give rise to the possibility of an “empirical bubble” (as Larry Ribstein has described it) and a tendency to settle into reliance upon those tools as a substitute for finding new and interesting questions to answer. [read post]
26 Jul 2010, 10:01 pm
As Larry Ribstein has been asking for years, do we really want to be sending a message to investors that risk is bad when it often leads to valuable innovation and wealth creation? [read post]
1 Jun 2012, 1:54 pm by Jeff Lipshaw
 Rather, the current problem is institutional and structural, as Brian Tamanaha, the late Larry Ribstein, Bill Henderson, and others have observed. [read post]
22 May 2007, 2:10 am
These include Scott Riddle at the Georgia Bankruptcy Law Blog, Francis Pileggi at the Delaware Corporate and Commercial Litigation Blog, and three law professors whose articles the Delaware Supreme Court cited in the opinion: Professor Stephen Bainbridge at ProfessorBainbridge.com, Professor Larry Ribstein at Ideoblog, and Professor Fred Tung at Conglomerate.The Next Big Insolvency Case. [read post]
13 Nov 2010, 12:45 pm by Kim Krawiec
  (A point Larry Ribstein also makes in his excellent blog post about our paper over at Truth on The Market). [read post]
14 Mar 2008, 5:47 pm
Update 2: The blogosphere is picking up the story quickly, as Larry Ribstein, Ellen Podgor (see also here) and Warren Meyer have already commented. [read post]
31 Mar 2011, 1:20 pm by Steve Bainbridge
Larry Ribstein opines: Sokol may have had material information when he bought his second batch of shares: i.e., that he was going to pitch the company to Buffett. [read post]
1 Oct 2012, 2:00 am by Peter Mahler
 The late, great Professor Larry Ribstein, whom I interviewed for this blog here, in a 2008 article in the Virginia Law & Business Review, attributed ULLCA’s ”dismal adoption record” to “drafting compromises” and its inclusion of “idiosyncratic provisions that reflected the influence of lawyers and other powerful interest groups. [read post]