Search for: "Level v. State"
Results 1141 - 1160
of 29,812
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
16 Jan 2007, 8:24 am
The court, in this resentencing, is not limited to just taking off two levels, but can resentence.US v. [read post]
10 Feb 2020, 11:00 pm
In Massachusetts v. [read post]
3 Jan 2024, 6:00 am
Citing Summa v Hofstra Univ., 708 F3d 115 [quoting Cifra v Gen. [read post]
3 Jan 2024, 6:00 am
Citing Summa v Hofstra Univ., 708 F3d 115 [quoting Cifra v Gen. [read post]
22 Mar 2024, 5:17 am
" But then in House v. [read post]
8 Jul 2015, 11:17 am
Texas, United States v. [read post]
24 Feb 2015, 3:00 am
Co. v. [read post]
5 Aug 2014, 9:09 am
Judge Kollar-Kotelly makes clear that a detainee’s threat level is irrelevant in determining whether detention is legal under the AUMF. [read post]
8 Feb 2012, 1:21 pm
Appealed from the United States District Court for the Northern District of California. [read post]
16 Oct 2008, 12:15 pm
In Connolly v. [read post]
22 Sep 2008, 11:21 am
The case must be viewed upon its own particular facts and, as Sir Mark stated, horses had been a prominent feature in the lives of both of these parties. [read post]
11 Aug 2021, 8:40 am
Johnson & Johnson v. [read post]
18 May 2007, 12:25 pm
In United States v. [read post]
20 Mar 2018, 9:01 pm
In those other cases—chiefly Loving v. [read post]
20 May 2020, 9:01 pm
In New Energy Company Co. v. [read post]
25 Mar 2015, 4:12 am
This assistance need not, however, rise to the level of a “but for” contribution. [read post]
11 Sep 2023, 1:13 pm
Currently pending before the United States Supreme Court is the matter of Acheson Hotels, LLC v. [read post]
States Support Plaintiffs Lawsuit that Prop 65 Warning for Products Containing Glyphosate Violates F
8 Jan 2018, 7:25 pm
See Zauderer v. [read post]
17 Jun 2008, 2:18 am
This case will involve the review of Iqbal v. [read post]
9 Aug 2013, 1:24 pm
Flood Control Dist. v. [read post]